Board logo

标题: TT语法--OG15 [打印本页]

作者: grasses    时间: 2005-8-21 05:59     标题: TT语法--OG15


OG No.15
In his research paper, Dr. Frosh,medical director of the Payne Whitney Clinic, distinguishes (moodngs, which may be violent without their being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis.)

B. moodngs, perhaps violent without being grounded in mental disease, and genuine manic-depressive psychosis.
C. between moodngs ,which may be violent without being grounded in mental disease, and genuine manic-depressive psychosis.
D. between moodngs, perhaps violent without being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis.
E. genuine manic-depressive psychosis and moodngs,which may be violent without being grounded in mental disease.

The answer is C. OG中说B中perhaps violent is awkward and less clear thanC中which may be violent,为什么呢?我觉得好像两个的表达的意思都应该是一样的啊!也就是说如果B中加上between的话,为什么还是应该选C呢?
什么是把握一种表达是不是awkward或者是否clear的标准呢?

作者: merit    时间: 2005-8-21 18:58

这个类似的问题原来joy问过了,因为which使得 violent 的逻辑主语更加明确,如果没有的话好象这个violent 的逻辑主语是其他的事情。这是一个常见的问题.
作者: steveyangxt    时间: 2006-1-6 10:45

可以看成是省略形式, 但是这种省略不太好而已。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2