国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: GWD-8-Q28 [打印本页]

作者: bodkicker 时间: 2012-4-29 06:31 标题: GWD-8-Q28

GWD-8-Q25-Q28

Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the modernization of a telephone exchange on exchange maintenance work and workers is a solid contribution to a debate that encompasses two lively issues in the history and socialogy of technology: technological determinism and social constructivism. Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a technology have a Gdecisive influence on job skills and work organization. Put more strongly, technology can be a primary determinant of social and managerial organization. Clark

believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social choices. For Braverman, the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. Technological change is construed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and configuration of the machinery. This position represents the new mainstream called social constructivism.

The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism: technological determinists are supposed to believe, for example, that machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society. The alternative to constructivism, in other words, is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization. Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments. Theoretically he defines “technology” in terms of relationships between social and technical variables. Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is just scrap unless it is organized functionally and supported by appropriate systems of operation and maintenance. At the empirical level Clark

shows how a change at the telephone exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semi-electronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers. Some changes Clark attriutes to the particular way management and labor unions negotiated the introduction of the technology, whereas others are seen as arising from the capabilities and nature of the technology itself. Thus Clark helps answer the question: “When is social choice decisive and when are the concrete characteristics of technology more important?”

GWD-8-Q28:

Which of the following statements about the modernization of the telephone exchange is supported by information in the passage?

A. The new technology reduced the role of managers in labor negotiations.

B. The modernization was implemented without the consent of the employees directly affected by it.

C. The modernization had an impact that went significantly beyond maintenance routines.

D. Some of the maintenance workers felt victimized by the new technology.

E. The modernization gave credence to the view of advocates of social constructivism.

这个答案是怎么来的啊？？求解释！！被这篇阅读搞得死晕！！

作者: sogapink 时间: 2012-5-1 18:12

我也刚做到这里，也是这题毫无头绪

作者: voleroiseau 时间: 2012-5-2 20:15

文中以一句话：Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the modernization of a telephone exchange on exchange maintenance work and workers ....

经验那里的一句话：At the empirical level Clark shows how a change at the telephone exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semi-electronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers...

那个change就是modernization，而文中第一句提到，modernization 对exchange maintenance work有作用, 经验那段话又说modernization对work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers 是有影响的。

综上，modernization的影响不只maintenance routines这么点。

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)