大全-13-13. One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.
The correct answer is E. My question is , why D is incorrect?作者: yorku 时间: 2012-4-26 21:37
D是说Managers普遍更容易接受来自于他们自身产业外的新想法。即 鼓励 M 与 非竞争企业 进行比较，是符合题意的么。。。。作者: Maybejessica 时间: 2012-4-27 06:33
题目说Discover better industrial practices
D outside the industry，和原文不符作者: yorku 时间: 2012-4-29 06:14
题目是问：（先不看except）
下面哪个选项假如是正确的, 可以成为一个合适的理由解释一个公司选择用非同行业竞争的公司来定义绩效基准,而不是和同行业的竞争者比较。
D
Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
经理们更容易接受外行业的idea，即鼓励 用外行业 作为参照对象来进行比较。
题目问的是哪一个不是。有一个 except
Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
经理们更容易接受外行业的idea，即鼓励 用外行业 作为参照对象来进行比较。
题目问的是哪一个不是。有一个 except
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
