标题: [求助]prep1-85 [打印本页]
作者: elvisc 时间: 2012-2-22 07:17 标题: [求助]prep1-85
85.
Fearing that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to make the corporate hierarchy rigid by inhibiting communication, some corporations shun the use of executive titles.
A title, however, can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses since it encourages outsiders to treat the executive with respect.
The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their titles externally but not within their corporations.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the compromise suggested above?
A. Only small corporations can preserve an atmosphere of mutual respect and high regard without having a rigid corporate hierarchy.
B. Referring to an executive by using a title can encourage both those outside the organization and inside the organization to treat the executive with respect.
C. Even if it is widely known within a corporation that the corporation's executives use executive titles outside their organizations, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.
D. A rigid corporate hierarchy can promote efficiency within an organization as well as provide access to the corporation for those outside the organization.
E. Although many corporate executives disapprove of rigid hierarchies on the grounds that they inhibit communication, the vast majority of executives have no qualms about using titles both internally and externally.
为什么我感觉C是削弱呢？ 请NN帮忙!
作者: robinyue 时间: 2012-2-22 19:12
支持啊。。。
取非代入验证
作者: stoner28 时间: 2012-2-23 06:39
谁能翻译下这个题目啊？
作者: hanshipeng 时间: 2012-2-23 19:20
试着翻译一下，不对请指正呵……
由于担心直接称呼管理者职位会使内部沟通拘谨，使组织内部显得级别森严，很多机构都尽量避免称呼领导的职位头衔。然而，一个职位头衔会方便机构的领导在外交际，因为外部人士会比较尊敬头衔较高的机构领导人。最妥善的解决领导们的头衔称谓问题的办法是在外部使用这些称谓而避免在组织内部使用这些称呼。
C：即使组织内部大家都知道管理者在外部使用职务称谓，但这并不影响内部上下级之间的交流。
是排除了文末的妥协方案可能带来的坏结果。从而支持结论
作者: haoqianruhaos 时间: 2012-2-26 21:41
这题还是不太明白，我使用排除法做对的
作者: anenxi 时间: 2012-2-27 06:36
prep的题大家都是用来模考的题，没摸前不想进来，很纠结
作者: anenxi 时间: 2012-2-27 06:38
参考文章的第一句和文章的最后一句，答案就是在这两句话上对第一句驳斥，对最后一句加强的
作者: leslielu 时间: 2012-3-13 06:45
题型：支持题，支持的对象：compromise:对外用title,对内不用
使用title有利有弊，好处：对外做交易，容易进行，因为title让外人更加尊重行政人员
坏处：title让主管更加严厉，以至于阻碍交流。折中办法：对外用title,对内不用
类似于plan-goal的文章，加强的方法：plan可行/plan能够实现goal（本题）
plan：compromise,对外用title，对内不用
goal:对外让外人尊重，对内不阻碍交流
A 说明用title的好处，用了对内也让人尊重
B 说明用title的好处，用了对内也让人尊重
C 说明对外用title可以保证对内不阻碍交流（plan能够是吸纳goal）
D 说明用title的好处，提高效率
E 说明可以用title，尽管担心阻碍交流，大家还是有信心对内对外都用title
综上，只有C是连接了用title和不用title两种效果的
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |