Board logo

标题: Lsat 5-S2-4 [打印本页]

作者: zyh79    时间: 2002-10-27 09:41     标题: Lsat 5-S2-4

4. A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.

Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?

(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.

(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.

(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.

(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.

(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.

第一句话到底是表示成: Inviting+Functional ==> Unobtrusive, 还是: Unobtrusive ==> Inviting + Functional ,如果是第一种的话, 那就得不出 not Functional ==> not Unobtrusive 也就得不出答案B
作者: bessette    时间: 2002-10-27 17:33

希望大家讨论一下这题,因为这有可能是一个大家都疏忽的小细节,谢谢各位高手!!
作者: 猫猫头    时间: 2002-10-27 17:49

我觉得是第二种
因为它的结构是if ...to be,...must be
后面是必要条件
作者: zyh79    时间: 2002-10-27 18:17

我也认为后面是必要条件,不过那就应该是第一种
Inviting+Functional ==> Unobtrusive,这里 Unobtrusive是必要条件
作者: 猫猫头    时间: 2002-10-27 18:18

啊?是这样表示的啊??
怎么跟我数学里面的不一样 ??
这样很奇怪哎
作者: zyh79    时间: 2002-10-27 18:21

A==>B,A为B的充分条件,B为A的必要条件。
数学里怎样的啊?
作者: 猫猫头    时间: 2002-10-27 18:26

哦,不好意思哎,是我看错了
你写得对的,跟数学里的一样
是我写错了
^0^
作者: yiyuan05    时间: 2002-10-28 15:47

同意,是第二种。
作者: bessette    时间: 2002-10-28 20:02

to 西耳,

If it is to be ..., must be 和 If it is, must be 有什么区别? 谢谢!
作者: happin    时间: 2002-11-6 23:11

本人也为这道题郁闷了好几天,我与 zyh79 兄的疑问一样,想来想去都应该是第一种理解法。请高手再指点一下好吗?




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2