标题: 求问TT GWD9-19 [打印本页]
作者: hebby0513 时间: 2012-1-14 06:50 标题: 求问TT GWD9-19
GWD-9-Q19:In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.
A a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
B a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
C corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
D corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
E the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
请教正确答案,我觉得正确答案是A。划线部分前面的a corporation commits....whenever....commits a crime对应前面的“in the US today”,后面的两个if是虚拟语气,所以用过去式"acted"和"benefited"。但是我不是很肯定这个解释,求教,谢谢。
作者: triangel8866 时间: 2012-1-15 06:52
正确答案就是A,难道LZ没有答案?
作者: hebby0513 时间: 2012-1-16 06:42
hi, thx a lot! I do have the answer but it invloves many other mistakes which I have to double check every answer. but thx a lot for help!
作者: zhengqingku 时间: 2012-1-16 21:10
why not e?
作者: DayDreamin 时间: 2012-1-17 06:51
最后一段:“and if the corporation benefited as a result”
注意parallelism
作者: chamcham 时间: 2012-1-18 08:35
E:
- corporation不能用whose
- employees和employee不对称
作者: qiuhua012345 时间: 2012-2-3 21:19
umm...E中的whose是可以, LS可以看一下OG/Prep, 很多句子都是用whose指代非animated的東東.
LZ可能把E打錯...如果沒打錯"commit a crime"之後的comma造成fragment.
作者: triangel8866 时间: 2012-2-5 07:52
可是如果A是虚拟的话,为什么主句没有would/might/could 呢?
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |