国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: 求助GWD-8-Q17 [打印本页]

作者: shinboy 时间: 2011-12-26 06:54 标题: 求助GWD-8-Q17

GWD-8-Q17:

Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

A.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D.having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E.having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have

答案是A,为什么D不对 having been beached 不是可以很好地修饰whale吗

A.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C.that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D.having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E.having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have

答案是A,为什么D不对 having been beached 不是可以很好地修饰whale吗

作者: shell6688 时间: 2011-12-26 21:56

having been done本來就是典型錯誤的用法而且你看 been

beached是被動，後面又有by hominids 句子的意思就變成被人類擱淺

作者: tkcamfan 时间: 2011-12-27 06:35

having been 结构很啰嗦，完全可以省略掉。

作者: shinboy 时间: 2011-12-28 06:44

en 是啊 by homids 可以修饰前面的分句引起歧义正解谢谢

作者: bastencool 时间: 2011-12-28 21:11

句子中有a million years ago 这是一个用过去式的时间状语标志，这里是用过去式客观描述一个事实。楼上仁兄也说了having been done 是一个错误的句式，而且present perfect不能更客观的描述这个事实~

个人看法.

作者: shinboy 时间: 2011-12-29 06:46

是啊 a million ago都没注意到那就一定要用一般过去了~

作者: larrylw 时间: 2011-12-29 21:27

请问这种having been 结构如果出现是不是通常是错误的呢？陈向东的语法也是这么说的？
这题我把was看成修饰fossils，选错了。哎

作者: genius1824 时间: 2011-12-30 21:38

了解句意还是很重要的，否则在主动和被动力纠结……

作者: nevermindband 时间: 2012-1-2 20:32

Fossils（主） of a whale（介词短语作定语修饰fossils） that（定语从句修饰whale，先行词that指代whale，在从句中做主语） beached（从句谓语） on an African shore more than a million years ago（从句状语） and was subsequently butchered（从句并列谓语） by hominids（从句第二谓语之宾语） have been recovered（主句谓语） by paleontologists（主句宾语）.

作者: kevinh1217 时间: 2012-1-3 00:42

同求。。

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)