Board logo

标题: A-17 E为什么不对 [打印本页]

作者: freesimens    时间: 2005-6-14 07:00     标题: A-17 E为什么不对

. With Proposition 13, if you bought your house 11 years ago for $75,000, your property tax would be approximately $914 a year (1 percent of $75,000 increased by 2 percent each year for 11 years); and if your neighbor bought an identical house next door to you for $200,000 this year, his tax would be $2,000 (1 percent of $200,000). Without Proposition 13, both you and your neighbor would pay $6,000 a year in property taxes (3 percent of $200,000).

Which of the following is the conclusion for which the author most likely is arguing in the passage above?

(A) Proposition 13 is unconstitutional because it imposes an unequal tax on properties of equal value.

(B) If Proposition 13 is repealed, every homeowner is likely to experience a substantial increase in property taxes.

(C) By preventing inflation from driving up property values, Proposition 13 has saved homeowners thousands of dollars in property taxes.

(D) If Proposition 13 is not repealed, identical properties will continue to be taxed at different rates.B

(E) Proposition 13 has benefited some homeowners more than others.


作者: freesimens    时间: 2005-6-14 14:47

为什么是B呢?


作者: sammen    时间: 2005-6-14 17:35

B 我认为没错,因为文章是在讲Proposition 13 not repeal的话,大家可以少交财产税,这个在文章最后是提到了的。而D这个相反的情况文章没提到。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2