Board logo

标题: 求助:OG10 104 [打印本页]

作者: AnttiZhang    时间: 2011-12-2 07:00     标题: 求助:OG10 104

104. Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 – when outlays for research and development increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?
(A) Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.
(B) Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.
(C) Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.
(D) In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.
(E) Tax credits market for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.

answer:D
D怎么翻译啊?
作者: triangel8866    时间: 2011-12-2 21:52

D的意思是,如果没有那25%的税收抵免,1981年后的研究和发展的商业消费也不会比那会低到哪里去~就是说否定了题目中的结论:1981年旨于提高研究和发展的商业税收抵免,对于刺激消费没起什么作用~
作者: AnttiZhang    时间: 2011-12-4 06:32

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?
如果D否定了题目中的结论,那和问得就不符了啊,问得是那个一成立,结论才成立啊。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2