NN请帮忙帮我看看这道题的B有什么不对?谢谢!!

8. On the basis of incontestable proof that car safety seats will greatly reduce the number of serious injuries sustained by children in car accidents, laws have been passed mandating the use of these seats. Unexpectedly, it has since been found that a large number of children who are riding in safety seats continue to receive serious injuries that safety seats were specifically designed to avoid, and in the prevention of which they in fact have proven to be effective.

Which one of the following, if true, could by itself adequately explain the unexpected finding reported in the passage?

(A) Many parents are defying the law by not using safety seats for their children.

(B) Children are more likely to make automobile trips now than they were before the introduction of the safety seat.

(C) The high cost of child safety seats has caused many parents to delay purchasing them.

(D) The car safety seat was not designed to prevent all types of injuries, so it is not surprising that some injuries are sustained.

(E) The protection afforded by child safety seats depends on their being used properly, which many parents fail to do.

这个题目我选的是E.说明了死亡率还是高的原因是家长们没好好的使用.这个题目是解释题型,那么选项就改针对文章里的矛盾.AB是比较明显的不可以.C说了是推迟,那么就是没使用,哪不能解释为什么使用了还是死亡率高.D不好,但是我原因说不太好.我作题的时候主要是和E比较了一下觉得没E明显.safety seat都不能避免serious injures那还有什么用处啊,呵呵,这个不是推理,只是个人的感觉.希望大家讨论.

Is E the right answer?

B does not help explain the unexpected findings, because if it is

MANDATED by law to use the car safety seats for kids, no matter how

many children ride the car, how often they ride it, more children ride

it now than before, IT DOES NOT MATTER, because every kids on every

ride should be put in the safety seat. If a percentage of kids who

sustains injury is stated here, B will make more sense.