In ancient Thailand, much of the local artisans’ creative
energy was expended for the creation of Buddha images and
when they constructed and decorated the temples that
enshrined them.
􀂃 (A) much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended
for the creation of Buddha images and when they constructed and
decorated the temples that enshrined them。
􀂃 (B) much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended
on the creation of Buddha images and on construction and
decoration of the temples in which they were enshrined
􀂃 (C) much of the local artisans’ creative energy was expended
on the creation of Buddha images as well as constructing and
decoration of the temples in which they were enshrined
􀂃 (D) creating images of Buddha accounted for much of the local
artisans’ creative energy, and also constructing and
decorating the temples enshrining them
􀂃 (E) the creation of Buddha images accounted for much of the
local artisans’ creative energy as well as construction and
decoration of the temples that enshrined them(B)
我有两个问题：
一 、D中的 as well as 和and 的区别, 看了以前NN的帖子，很多很乱，我自己总结了一下几点，不知道对不对~
1.A and B,说明A和b完全并列;如果是A as well as B的话，A 和 B不是并列的,B是附加的内容，类似于插入语，对动词的数没有影响。所以如果句子的意思是要列举几个完全并列的东西时，我们应该用a, b, and c 如果不并列的时候就用a and b, as well as c。但是问题是我怎么作者是不是要表达完全并列呢？（这个问题似乎有点白痴）
2。如果as well as 前面是动词不定式，那么其后的动词也是不定式，但to要省略
3。as well as 用于肯定结构和否定结构中，其意义不同。as well as 和not搭配使用，as well as 位于not前时，两者均否定；位于not后时，否定前者，肯定后者
不知道还有什么更好的方法可以判断选 and 还是 as well as ，似乎OG上面选的都是 and
二、and also 的使用
and also 出现的时候一般都是错误选项，但是我记得好像OG上面也有一题是选 and also正确的（忘记是哪题了），这个到底怎么判断 and also 是不是词义重复呢？作者: FGHYU19912301 时间: 2011-11-6 20:32
1.as well as和and前后修饰的成分层次不一样，and连接的成分是同一层次的，是并列的；as well as是不并列的，前面的主要成分，后面的是较低层的，所以就像你说的，as well as不改变动词的单复，因为核心词是前面的那个。
2.在做题时，当遇到平行问题时，可以把as well as看做and，既然and连接的成分要平行，那么as well as连接的成分也要平行，当然也适用于不定式。
3.and also确实一般都是重复的，因为二者通常表示的意思是一样的，但是当also有表示强调后面成分的时候，就不是重复了，建议你在做题时先把这个当成错误选项，等排除到最后再回过头看含有and also的选项。作者: oovictoroo 时间: 2011-11-7 06:26
解释得好好哦！！！！谢谢NN，好可爱的名字~~~~ 我对2有点疑问，意思说如果as well as前面是不定时， 后面接不定时的时候不用省略 to 了吗？ 还有3, 可不可以具个also是表示强调后面成分的句子呢？~~~作者: triangel8866 时间: 2011-11-8 06:42
我想补问一句：怎么样理解这里的they指代问题？很多TX说they指代buddha images,因为是noun of sth的结构，所以可以指代sth，而前面的local artisans' creative energy是noun's sth的形式所以不可以。这样的说法是对的马？
另外，前面的creation of buddha images and on construction and decoration of ....突然后面出现了一个they，要怎么分析这个they是指代前面的谁的？因为noun实在很多,求分析句型！
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
