标题: 天山9Q35 to Q37: [打印本页]
作者: zhengqingku 时间: 2011-9-20 21:24 标题: 天山9Q35 to Q37:
For many years, historians thought
that the development of capitalism had no
faced serious challenges in the United
Line States. Writing in the early twentieth cen-
(5) tury, Progressive historians sympathized
with the battles waged by farmers and
small producers against large capitalists
in the late nineteenth century, but they di
not question the widespread acceptance
(10) of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism
throughout American history. Similarly,
Louis Hartz, who sometimes disagreed
with the Progressives, argued that American
accepted laissez-faire capitalism
(15) without challenge because they lacked
a feudal, precapitalist past. Recently,
however, some scholars have argued
that even though laissez-faire became
the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century
(20) America, it was not accepted without
struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism, they
suggest, clashed with existing religious
and communitarian norms that imposed
moral constraints on acquisitiveness to
(25) protect the weak from the predatory, the
strong from corruption, and the entire culture
from materialist excess. Buttressed
by mercantilist notions that government
should be both regulator and promoter
(30) of economic activity, these norms persisted
long after the American Revolution
helped unleash the economic forces that
produced capitalism. These scholars
argue that even in the late nineteenth
(35) century, with the government’s role in
the economy considerably diminished,
laissez-faire had not triumphed completely.
Hard times continued to revive
popular demands for regulating busi-
(40) ness and softening the harsh edges of
laissez-faire capitalism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q35:
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the United States
Answer
这是天山九－35，第３５回没有看到讨论汇总里有相关的前人讨论,
这题35题我第一次测时,只抓前面三个大字所以快速选了D选,
觉得本文的确在summarize一些scholars的论点,…………,但是
当我再仔细回读之后发现我在B和D选之间陷入二难的局面….
很难再把B选剔除……….原因如下:
1.Summarize 与synthesize语意上相通
2.two competing argument也有,就是指historians的论点与scholars的论点不太一样
而正确答案D表示summarize有关在美国资本主义发展的论证的一个refutation,感觉上也对!!!!
的确是在对这个放任的自由主义广被接受提出refutate…….
天啊!!!!!!!!哪位好心的大大能帮忙解答????
作者: Roro666 时间: 2011-9-21 06:24
这个35题选D没错。
不过，36题答案是E，我当初看了很久，想选的，不过觉得很晦涩，搞不明白就放弃了，选了B，请牛牛帮助看一下啊
T-9-Q36
According to the passage, the Progressive historians mentioned in line 5 and the scholars mentioned in line 17 disagree with regard to which of the following?
A Whether laissez-faire became the predominant ethos in the nineteenth-century United States
B Whether moral restraints on acquisitiveness were necessary in the nineteen-century United States
C The economic utility of mercantilist notions of government
D The nature of the historical conditions necessary for the development of laissez-faire capitalism in the nineteen-century United States
E The existence of significant opposition to the development of laissez-faire capitalism in the nineteen-century United States
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |