Board logo

标题: FT VS PT [打印本页]

作者: yongjiew    时间: 2011-9-10 09:26     标题: FT VS PT

PT MBA的含金量比 FT的真的差很远吗?
为什么呢?
作者: linbingcheng    时间: 2011-9-12 20:07

FT含金量肯定高吧
但是放弃目前的工作去读,难啊
作者: YEWCHOW    时间: 2011-9-13 06:40

let's think about whether the school would hire a separate set of

profs for FT and PT...

in reality, a single prof. would most likely teach both FT and PT

courses...
and for PT, students are generally older, more mature, more industry

experience, more connections, more networks... the only drawback is

the PT students would need to balance work and study... therefore

the workload for FT and PT might be different... but that doesn't

mean one is better than the other. on the other hand, the needs for

FT and PT are different...  

PT students generally like the prof. could offer real life solution

for solving the student's real life problems... if the prof. only

talking theories and cases, that wouldn't do much of a great job...
作者: yongjiew    时间: 2011-9-13 21:09

谢谢!
作者: Rachel夏夕空    时间: 2011-9-13 21:12

文凭是一样的,关键是你要什么。全职读机会成本很高
作者: sprite112    时间: 2011-9-14 06:07

同意LZ的说法,其实个人觉得如同大学里面的专业一样,很多人到了社会

以后从事的也不是本专业,无所谓好坏,重要的是学校里里面是需要学会思考

的方法以及独立思考的能力。人生一辈子都在学习,NEVER STOP。 SO PT AND

FT,不必太拘泥。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2