Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage.Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
把文章分一下段落：
1. Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. 2. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. 3. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 4. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.
The structure of this argument is: 1 = background fact。2, therefore 3。However, 4 (which weakens conclusion 3)。If you figure out that much, then it's clear that #3 is the CONCLUSION. The single most important thing to do on critical reasoning is to figure out what's the conclusion. A doesn't make sense because the second boldface in this case is not really a claim; it's a logical consequence of the preceding fact, and so should be regarded as another fact. Remember that the word “conclusion” should only be used to refer to claims, not facts.
因此第二个粗体部分是一个事实，而不是一个结论，一个claims。
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
