Board logo

标题: GWD 23 Q23新问 [打印本页]

作者: mermaid2011    时间: 2011-8-24 06:44     标题: GWD 23 Q23新问

GWD-23-Q23

After several years of rapid growth, the healthy carecompany became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitanarea, while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business,falling months behind in its payment to doctors and hospitals.







A.   while it then proved unable to handle theincrease in business, falling months behind in its payment to




B.   while it then proved unable to handle theincrease in business and fell months behind in its payment to




C.   but then it proved unable to handle the increasein business, falling months behind in its paying




D.   but then proving unable to handle theincrease in business, falling months behind in paying




E.   but then proved unable to handle theincrease in business, falling months behind in paying




正确答案:E




记得之前在Manhattan上看过如果前后两句主语一样,不能用逗号隔开。




曼哈顿上的例句是这样的:Earl walked to school, and later ate his lunch.(错误)。如果按照这一原则,E不就不对了吗。求解答!!!



作者: haoye12321    时间: 2011-8-24 20:21

表睬它 GMAT允许的..<它的意思是最好不要加逗号 多此一举>

.....我怎么觉得我讲话又开始粗鲁了...
作者: rockstonexS    时间: 2011-8-25 06:33

这两句不一样啊

例句是逗号两个clause:earl 走路,(earl)吃饭。
e的逗号后面是gerund,没有动词,相当于一句modifier。

是吗?
作者: mermaid2011    时间: 2011-8-25 20:49

E中prove是主动表被动,不是modifier,我非常确定,这是prove的一种用法
作者: haoye12321    时间: 2011-8-26 06:20

Earl walked to school, and later ate his lunch.----accepted in test.

while the  following expressions are preferable.
Earl walked to school , and later Earl ate his lunch< comma;and--->repeat of the subject>
Earl walked to school and later ate his lunch.<without comma ;and--->omit the subject>
作者: mermaid2011    时间: 2011-8-26 21:43

所以仅仅是哪个哪那个不好的问题,而不是哪个正确的问题
作者: lanshichao92    时间: 2011-8-27 21:11

话说下次再碰到这种 ,and或者 ,but后面的主语跟前面主语一样的情况,到底是省还是不省啊
作者: haoye12321    时间: 2011-8-28 07:41

不是核心,先看别的问题,不会仅仅将这个作为区别正确与否的考点。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2