1。During her presidency of the short-lived Woman’s State Temperance Society (1852-1853), Elizabeth Cady Stanton, as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be made sufficient cause for divorce.

as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be as she was a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by her suggestion of drunkenness being in being a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, had scandalized many of her most ardent supporters with the suggestion of drunkenness being a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, she scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in suggesting that drunkenness should be

the answer is d, that is ok, no problem

这里想到一个问题，

a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be

这里可不可以改成 as a staunch advocate呢，也就是说变成Elizabeth Cady Stanton as a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws 这样改可不可以呢，和答案中的形式有何区别呢？请指教

语法上是没有错的，都成立。

不过逻辑上有问题，两者的区别是限定性修饰和非限定性修饰，请参考OG141关于两者在逻辑意义上的区别。