Board logo

标题: GWD29-Q4 [打印本页]

作者: ChinaHawk    时间: 2011-4-26 06:46     标题: GWD29-Q4

plz XDJM help me to figure out why the answer is C not BIn a 1984 book, Claire C, Robertson argued that, before colonialism, age was a more important indicator of status and authority than gender in Ghana and in Africa generally. British colonialism imposed European- style male dominant notions upon more egalitarian local situations to the detriment of women generally, and gender became a defining characteristic that weakened women’s power and authority.


Subsequent research in
            Kenya convinced Robertson that she had overgeneralized about Africa. Before colonialism, gender was more salient in central Kenya than it was in Ghana, although age was still crucial in determining authority. In contrast with Ghana, where women had traded for hundreds of years and achieved legal majority (not unrelated phenomena), the evidence regarding central Kenya indicated that women were legal minors and were sometimes treated as male property, as were European women at that time. Factors like strong patrilinearity and patrilocality, as well as women’s inferior land rights and lesser involvement in trade, made women more dependent on men than was generally the case in Ghana. However, since age apparently remained the overriding principle of social organization in central Kenya, some senior women had much authority. Thus, Robertson revised her hypothesis somewhat, arguing that in determining authority in precolonial Africa age was a primary principle that superseded gender to varying degrees depending on the situation.

7. GWD29-Q4:

The passage indicates that Robertson’s research in Kenya caused her to change her mind regarding which of the following?


A.
Whether age was the prevailing principle of social organization in Kenya before colonialism

B.
Whether gender was the primary determinant of social authority in Africa generally before colonialism

C.
Whether it was only after colonialism that gender became a significant determinant of authority in Kenyan society

D.
Whether age was a crucial factor determining authority in Africa after colonialism

E.
Whether British colonialism imposed European-style male-dominant notions upon local situations in Ghana


TKS
作者: philipyu1025    时间: 2011-4-26 20:08

原文:
CCR原来认为:殖民前,age比gender重要,只是殖民后,gender才变得重要。
Kenyan事实:殖民前,age比gender高的不是一点点。(However, since age apparently remained the overriding principle of social organization in central Kenya, some senior women had much authority)
CCR修改结论:殖民前,age是第一重要的,gender基本不算什么。
作者: yidiyuehans    时间: 2011-4-27 06:41

B:谈论的是gender,且说是“是否是primary”的问题,但是CCR最后认为age是最最最重要的,其他忽略不计。所以根本不关心gender的问题。
C:因为自始至终CCR认为gender在殖民前是不重要的,所以也就是探究是不是确实是这样:殖民前不重要,殖民后才变得重要。

这个文章观点交错在一起,又有overgeneralize迷惑,但是关键是后面的“However, since age apparently remained the overriding principle of social organization in central Kenya, some senior women had much authority”,表明了CCR的最终态度。
作者: suners    时间: 2011-4-27 12:36

回复 2# philipyu1025

文章结论没有说“gender基本不算什么”。

文章最后一句“age was a primary principle that superseded gender to varying degrees depending on the situation”,说age是主要的,age或多或少在gender之上,但是不同情况,程度不同。
   

作者: suners    时间: 2011-4-27 12:51

CCR原来认为:在before colonism,age比gender重要,在Ghana和非洲普遍都是。是colonism之后,英国殖民带来了gender的标准。

但是,Kenya在before colonism,gender的作用>Ghana的,但是age仍是crucial的,overriding的重要。

因此CCRovergeneralize了非洲的情况,改成了具体问题具体分析,age比gender是不同程度的重要。

虽然修改了理论,但是始终age的primary低位没有变,修改的只是比其他因素的差距程度。A和B,都是CCR的观点,而且也没有修改。

而正是因为C,CCR补充了各种情况,因为Age>gender在Kenya>在Ghana。所以,总结出比起age的不同程度的差距。
作者: 卮言浅夏    时间: 2011-4-27 21:45

楼上观点有误。
原来作者认为殖民前age重要,殖民后gender重要。但后来的研究发现在K地区,殖民前gender也非常重要,因此出于考虑:whether it was only after colonialism that….. 使作者改变了她的观点。选C。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2