Board logo

标题: [求助]GWD12Q8 [打印本页]

作者: pengyayun    时间: 2011-4-24 19:51     标题: [求助]GWD12Q8

Acting on the recommen-

dation of a British government
committee investigating the
Line high incidence in white lead
(5) factories of illness among
employees, most of whom
were women, the Home Sec-
retary proposed in 1895 that
Parliament enact legislation
(10) that would prohibit women from
holding most jobs in white lead
factories. Although the
Women’s Industrial Defence
Committee (WIDC), formed
(15) in 1892 in response to earlier
legislative attempts to restrict
women’s labor, did not dis-
count the white lead trade’s
potential health dangers, it
(20) opposed the proposal, view-
ing it as yet another instance
of limiting women’s work
opportunities. Also opposing
the proposal was the Society
(25) for Promoting the Employment
of Women (SPEW), which
attempted to challenge it by
investigating the causes of ill-
ness in white lead factories.
(30) SPEW contended, and WIDC
concurred, that controllable
conditions in such factories
were responsible for the devel-
opment of lead poisoning.
(35) SPEW provided convincing
evidence that lead poisoning
could be avoided if workers
were careful and clean and
if already extant workplace
(40) safety regulations were
stringently enforced. How-
ever, the Women’s Trade
Union League (WTUL), which
had ceased in the late 1880’s
(45) to oppose restrictions on
women’s labor, supported the
eventually enacted proposal,
in part because safety regu-
lations were generally not
(50) being enforced in white lead
factories, where there were no
unions (and little prospect of
any) to pressure employers to
comply with safety regulations.
GWD-12-Q8:
Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 30-34 (“SPEW contended … lead poisoning”) ?

            E       Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers.
Answer: (A)
我选了E, SPEX contended 的是controllable conditions responsible for poisoning,要支持的这个观点 就是要找conditions in factory causes poisoning啊,和regulation无关啊 与A有关么?求教 没有讨论过呢

作者: seuhongkai    时间: 2011-4-25 06:39

同样表示不懂 我也选的E
A貌似与regulation有关 而不是controllable conditions
作者: suners    时间: 2011-4-25 14:46

回复 1# pengyayun


    (30) SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the devel-opment of lead poisoning.
(35) SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace (40) safety regulations were
stringently enforced.


这两句话,集中讨论了题目。第一句总的说是对于铅中毒的蔓延,是要追究controllable conditions的责任的。之后的展开,提供了这些可控的条件,的具体内容。
1. if workers were careful and clean 工人自己可以控制,避免中毒。
2. if already extant workplace (40) safety regulations were stringently enforced 通过控制安全规定的实施,可以避免中毒。

那么要支持这个说法,就是要支持1或者2。就是支持工人控制好了的,中毒少;或者安全规定实施好的,中毒少。
作者: philipyu1025    时间: 2011-4-25 19:49

是选A,答案就在原文如下

SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2