Board logo

标题: GWD-3-Q17: [打印本页]

作者: philipyu1025    时间: 2011-3-25 07:12     标题: GWD-3-Q17:

1.
GWD-3-Q17:

Brochure:
Help conserve our city’s water supply.
By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.
A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.



Criticism:
For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.



Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?




E    Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

不理解啊,为什么选B

还有这个题目,到底是支持还是反驳?


作者: JoshwuS    时间: 2011-3-25 20:48

是反驳Criticism,即支持Brochure。

B说把传统的园艺环境改成有储水功能的不单节省水费,还省下了肥料和杀虫剂的钱。
作者: philipyu1025    时间: 2011-3-26 10:51

got it,thanks a lot




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2