Board logo

标题: GWD 17-Q9 [打印本页]

作者: pangpangshin    时间: 2011-1-30 15:28     标题: GWD 17-Q9

Press Secretary:
Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.
But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.
So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?




E       Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

我在B E 中徘徊! 牛牛求解


作者: xiruihuang    时间: 2011-1-30 21:14

我支持选E, 选项B似乎在转述题干90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.
作者: piggycandys    时间: 2011-1-31 20:11

选B
题目中说要cancel的90%的项目在opposition parties的districts, 而secretary’s

argument 说这些要cancel的项目都是从nonpartisan auditors写的report中来的.但是文

中没有提到,这份nonpartisan auditors的report中,opposition parties和President’s

party各自需要cancel项目的比例. 换言之,如果这份report里面大部分要cancel的项目都

是President’s party的,而President只选了opposition parties需要cancel的那些项目,
则President就是在徇私舞弊~
作者: 卮言浅夏    时间: 2011-2-1 08:15

楼上MM的解释靠谱




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2