Board logo

标题: gwd-24-7 [打印本页]

作者: fhhrewr    时间: 2005-4-14 06:43     标题: gwd-24-7

GWD-24

24-7 Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since

(A) when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.

(B) foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.

(C) some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.

(D) elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source

(E) elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.

答案是D,我觉得可以接受,但是B也可以接受呀,为什么不对呢?


作者: sammen    时间: 2005-4-15 21:40

B和持续的破坏没什么关系啊。这里要看看前面的逻辑关系。前面说即使保留的可以提供足够的食物,破坏也是会继续的这是因为........,这里你加上B会发现前后没逻辑关系。
作者: fhhrewr    时间: 2005-4-17 13:34

懂了,强,谢谢了!!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2