标题: 求教：GWD26-Q17 will be to与will区别？！ [打印本页] 作者: zhangluE 时间: 2010-11-11 07:11 标题: 求教：GWD26-Q17 will be to与will区别？！
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.
A.
a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B.
a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C.
astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D.
astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E.
astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.
答案是C，我一直徘徊在C和D之间，不知道为什么要用will be to， 牛人们可否解释一下？！作者: sayysong 时间: 2010-11-11 20:09
首先developed a scale后面就应该用to表示目的而不是for,后面的will be to其实是分开的，will be和前面的how likely a particular asteroid or comet相连,然后才是to collide with Earth作者: zhangluE 时间: 2010-11-12 06:43
太牛了！一语道破天机！
谢谢楼上的牛牛！作者: zhaoyiqing 时间: 2010-11-13 06:39
C是comet will be likely to collide
E的意思不通，likelihood that比较好，likelihood of comet不好
原句要表示的是collide这个可能性，而非comet的可能性
may和likelihood重复。作者: zhangluE 时间: 2010-11-14 06:41
谢谢解释
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
