Board logo

标题: AWA5.0感想,GMAT考试作文经验分享 [打印本页]

作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:06     标题: AWA5.0感想,GMAT考试作文经验分享

刚刚查了电子成绩,AWA5.0,有点shock,意外。现在总结一下我的复习经历供参考AWA难度,希望对和我背景相似的xdjm们有帮助~
背景:
GRE AW 3.0(这是个彻底的悲剧><)
T 作文单项 24 (综合写作悲剧><)
复习:考前一天
a.找了某6.0大N的A魔版+6G自己准备的魔版,拿来反复记忆;
b.晚上看了狗狗I&A各约15道左右(此时感觉A都能找到3个错,I都能扯3个点,再一看还有N多狗狗等着我,于是自我安慰说OK了,就这样上场吧……);
c.仔细研读了黄金80篇的几篇范文,感觉比GRE的I简单,字数更少,逻辑更简单,深度也低些,于是我放宽了心态,暗道,KAO,总不会比6G的3.0更鹾了吧……;
d.没有练过一篇,因为只有十来天复习,AWA被我无情地舍弃了::><::;
考试ing:
a.进去得比较早,旁边的某姐键盘敲得巨fast, 心一颤手就有点抖了,总是少打或多打字母,很是郁闷。。。
b.我深深的记得A打完第一段已经过去10min了……当时死的心都有了,为毛我考前没有在电脑上敲下魔版啊
c.自我感觉,A&I的字数两篇我差不多,估计400出头,所以最后成绩5.0挺shock的(考前问前辈都跟我说500……当时我就黯然了,考T 的时候,我独立写作觉得打得神速也只有450/30min, 这个要500/30min??!! 哈搞笑滴吧::><:
呵呵,以上是我的AWA总结,似乎鸡马特的AWA比较简单?至少在我的6G的AW vs. AWA上来看是这样。
以此总结希望对没有啥时间复习AWA,背景和我相似的xdjm有帮助呵~~祝考试大吉!!

放上我用的某大N的魔版~觉得是我见过的最后滴
请见http://forum.topway.org/viewthread.php?tid=219843&extra=
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:19

Argument
时序性因果攻击Firstly, the author is engaged in ‘after this, therefore, because of this’ reasoning. The line of reasoning is that because A happened before B, the former caused the latter. However, this reasoning is fallacious unless other possible causal factors have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C. As a result, any decision aimed at addressing the problem of B must be based on a more thorough investigation to gather data in order to narrow down and locate the actual cause of B.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:20

同时性因果攻击Secondly, the author’s solution rests on the assumption that A is the cause of B just because A coincided with B. However, a mere positional correlation does not necessarily prove a causal relationship. In addition, all other prospective causes of B, such as C and D, must be ruled out. Without detailed analysis of the real source of B, it would be groundless to attribute B to A.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:20

错误类比攻击Additionally, it is highly doubtful that strategies drawn from A are applicable to B. However, differences between these two clearly outweigh the similarities, therefore making the analogy much less valid. For example, C and D all affect A but virtually absent in B. Accordingly, we can see that A and B are so dissimilar that B is unlikely to experience the same consequence if it adopts A’s strategies.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:21

非此即彼攻击Last but not least, the author unfairly assumes that a reader must make a either-or choice. However, the argument fails to rule out possibility that adjusting A and B might produce better results. Moreover, if the author is wrong in the assumption that A and B are the only causes of the problem, thus the most effective solution might include a complex of other factors—such as C and D. In any event, the author provides no justification for the mutually exclusive choice imposed on the reader.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:21

必要性攻击In the first place, the author unfairly assumes that B was determined solely by A. While A is a seemingly important element in determining B, it is hardly the only or even necessarily required element. This assumption overlooks other crucial criteria in determining B—such as C, D. Without accounting for these potential factors, the author concludes too hastily that …is the best way to achieve goals.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:21

充分性攻击In the second place, the author’s solution rests on the assumption that A is sufficient to give birth to the desired goals. However, if it turns out that B is due to a combination of factors, some of which will remain unchanged in the future, such as C and D, only A might have no impact on B.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:21

选择性样本攻击 A threshold problem is that the author provides no evidence to claim that the general group as a whole is of the same characteristic. The example cited, while suggestive of this trend, is insufficient to warrant that the sample is representative of the whole group. For example, I question that…Therefore, such evidence would be obviously unrepresentative. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious for the author to draw any conclusion at all.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:22

(与“选择性样本攻击”较类似) 样本代表性攻击Moreover, a possible methodology problem in the argument is that it is of bias. The term ‘so many’ is too vague to be statistically meaningful. It is very possible that workers who were more interested in the survey might be likely to respond to the questionnaire. Lacking in the information about the number of workers surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to assess the validity of the survey. For instance, if 1000 workers were surveyed but only 10 responded, the result should be highly suspect. Because the author fails to account for other interpretations, the survey would be useless in concluding that….
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:22

其他理由
忽略他因攻击Thirdly, the author has focused only on A. A more detailed analysis would reveal that other factors far outweigh the factor on which the author focuses. For example, C. Lacking a more comprehensive analysis of the causes, it is presumptuous for the author to claim that A solely determined B.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:22

因果倒置攻击At last, it is possible that the author has confused cause with effect. Perhaps A was a response to B. Since the author fails to account for this possibility, the claim that …is completely unwarranted.

样本数量攻击 Another problem that seriously weakens the logic of this argument is that the survey cited is based on too small a sample to be reliable. Offered in support of the argument, the only evidence is that…. Unless it can be shown that the sample is typical of all general group, the fact that … is groundless to claim that…
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:23

Loaded question和诚实性攻击  What’s more, the methodology of the survey is problematic for two reasons. For one thing, we are not informed whether the survey provided only 3 alternatives. If it did, the respondents, who might very well prefer another choice not provided in the survey, might be forced to give up their preferences. For another thing, we are not informed whether the survey responses were anonymous or confidential. The respondents might supply responses favored by their superiors who might conduct the survey. Both events would lead this survey unreliable, let alone draw the conclusion that…

样本时效性攻击Last but not least, another flaw that significantly undermines this argument is that the author neglects to indicate how recently the survey was actually conducted. When used to generally claim a particular group, the samples should be close enough to support the generalization, in order to prevent historical changes from invalidating the generalization. All we know is that the survey is recently published. The less recent the survey itself, the less reliable the results to demonstrate that…
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:23

差异概念攻击To begin with, we must establish the meaning of the vague concept A. If the term were synonymous with B, the evidence cited would strongly support the argument. However, A may be defined in other terms such as C and D. Accordingly, the author has drawn the conclusion too hastily due to the ignorance of other definitions of A.

范围内推攻击 What’s more, the most egregious reasoning error in this argument is that the author uses evidence pertaining to a general group on the basis of a particular B. Even if the reasoning may be sound in general sense, the particular situation in which B is involved may not be representative of the entire general group. It is possible that... If this is the case, the claim that… is ill founded.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:25

不随时变攻击Moreover, the author unfairly assumes that A will remain unchanged over the next decades. However, a mere recent one-year A is insufficient to claim that. Statistics from such limited anecdotal evidence is not a good indicator for this trend. In addition, it is possible that in the future, this trend would greatly fluctuate or even reverse, then the adoption of the author’s proposal might give birth to B, however, it might also have a negative impact on C1 and, in turns, C2. Admittedly, this argument would be even weaker and weaker each day as time goes by.
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:25

Issue

把题目复述一下      ? To some extent, I agree with the author’s general assertion that    if *** (即在作者的观点上,加上一些条件,有保留地赞同). However, the author unnecessarily extends this broad assertion to an irreversible extreme while overlooks other compelling factors that may affect this issue. On balance, my points of agreement and contention with the author involve the fundamental and deep analysis as discussed below.

On the one hand, I would like to admit that this statement, although suffers from some obvious drawbacks, has some merits primarily in some special cases in which the implicit rationale behind it accords with common sense and our experience in daily life. Hence, it is partially indisputable. After all, …..Even if,       In other words       .

Furthermore,           . All these evidence demonstrates beyond any doubt that_____.

(以上两段要找两个理由,来说明作者观点如何对)
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:25

On the other hand, recognizing that a more applicable choice must incorporate different aspects of the issue as sufficient as possible, I have to point out that the author overstates ______’s comparative significance, and fail to take into account other essential factors. In short, this assertion is problematic in two aspects. The first argument —the one that I think the most compelling— is that the author overlooked             , that is to say,           . The second argument —it might have been noticed by others-- is that in some occasion, it is quite difficult to           . Accordingly, I tend to concede that when it comes to some certain circumstances it is partially appropriate

(这里找两个理由说明在一些场合下,作者观点还是不成立的,因为不管什么论点,成立还是会有条件的。此段模版字数已经很多,你只要列出不成立的观点即可,言简意赅,因为一般到这个时候,时间也不多了,容不得你写例子了。)
作者: fifthstreet    时间: 2010-10-12 16:26

In conclusion, issue of ____________is a complex one, requiring subjective judgment, consequently, there are no easy or certain answers. So different are the personal experiences and emotional concerns among people with diverse culture that thousand individuals might hold thousand opinions. According to me,   把你开头的观点copy/paste上去.
作者: bobochener    时间: 2010-12-30 21:04

many  thanks @2
作者: allygmat7    时间: 2011-1-19 21:44

many    thanks (***(*)(()(()
作者: piggy_l    时间: 2011-1-25 16:18

good




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2