Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville creates unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned. Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution. Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?
<!--[if !supportLists]-->A. <!--[endif]-->Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances <!--[if !supportLists]-->B. <!--[endif]-->Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative
aspects associated with producing that outcom <!--[if !supportLists]-->C. <!--[endif]-->Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved
in greater degree by a different means <!--[if !supportLists]-->D. <!--[endif]-->Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s
position in order to be better able to attack it <!--[if !supportLists]-->E. <!--[endif]-->Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people 网上答案选E,但据我看应该选B:
Challenging an assumption thatcertain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome 环境学家们并没有否认雪上汽车会吸引来很多-many-游客从而给当地居民带来经济利益, 但他们指出“a great many"-非常多,比前面的many多--的滑雪爱好者因为雪上汽车带来的问题现在不来了。 因此,他们指出前面的收入很可能会被随之而产生的负效应---后者而抵消甚至盖过。 E的错误在于环境学家们并未直接反对雪上汽车会actually吸引客人过来。是选B。 答案错的。
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |