Board logo

标题: 大全68 [打印本页]

作者: piggycandys    时间: 2010-8-1 20:14     标题: 大全68

The uniqueness of the Japanese character is the result of two seemingly contradictory forces: the strength of traditions and selective receptivity to foreign achievements and inventions. As early as the 1860s, there were counter movements to the traditional orientation. Yukichi Fukuzawa, the most eloquent spokesman of Japan’s “Enlightenment,” claimed: “The Confucian civilization of the East seems to me to lack two things possessed by Western civilization: science in the material sphere and a sense of independence in the spiritual sphere.” Fukuzawa’s great influence is found in the free and individualistic philosophy of the Education Code of 1872, but he was not able to prevent the government from turning back to the canons of Confucian thought in the Imperial Rescript of 1890. Another interlude of relative liberalism followed World War I, when the democratic idealism of President Woodrow Wilson had an important impact on Japanese intellectuals and, especially students: but more important was the Leninist ideology of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. Again in the early 1930s, nationalism and militarism became dominant, largely as a result of failing economic conditions.

Following the end of World War II, substantial changes were undertaken in Japan to liberate the individual from authoritarian restraints. The new democratic value system was accepted by many teachers, students, intellectuals, and old liberals, but it was not immediately embraced by the society as a whole. Japanese traditions were dominated by group values, and notions of personal freedom and individual rights were unfamiliar.

Today, democratic processes are clearly evident in the widespread participation of the Japanese people in social and political life: yet, there is no universally accepted and stable value system. Values are constantly modified by strong infusions of Western ideas, both democratic and Marxist. School textbooks expound democratic principles, emphasizing equality over hierarchy and rationalism over tradition; but in practice these values are often misinterpreted and distorted, particularly by the youth who translate the individualistic and humanistic goals of democracy into egoistic and materialistic ones.

Most Japanese people have consciously rejected Confucianism, but vestiges of the old order remain. An important feature of relationships in many institutions such as political parties, large corporations, and university faculties is the oyabun-kobun or parent-child relation. A party leader, supervisor, or professor, in return for loyalty, protects those subordinate to him and takes general responsibility for their interests throughout their entire lives, an obligation that sometimes even extends to arranging marriages. The corresponding loyalty of the individual to his patron reinforces his allegiance to the group to which they both belong. A willingness to cooperate with other members of the group and to support without qualification the interests of the group in all its external relations is still a widely respected virtue. The oyabun-kobun creates ladders of mobility which an individual can ascend, rising as far as abilities permit, so long as he maintains successful personal ties with a superior in the vertical channel, the latter requirement usually taking precedence over a need for exceptional competence. As a consequence, there is little horizontal relationship between people even within the same profession.

5.
In developing the passage, the author does which of the following?

(A) Introduce an analogy

(B) Define a term

(C) Present statistics

(D) Cite an authorityB

(E) Issue a challenge

一直都不懂这题,请大家帮帮忙



作者: daoyinger    时间: 2010-8-2 06:32

the whole article is developping around the definition The uniqueness of the Japanese character is the result of two seemingly contradictory forces: the strength of traditions and selective receptivity to foreign achievements and inventions.  In other words, the article is telling how traditions and western culture impose on the Japanese character. so the answer is B.
作者: xiruihuang    时间: 2010-8-2 19:51

那cite an authority为什么错啊?在第一段处,就引用了FUKUzawa的claim了啊?
作者: mereimoun    时间: 2010-8-3 06:34

楼上的,为什么FUKU就是authority啊??文中不过说他是个”eloquent spokesman",我觉得选B是从最后一段的oyabun-kobun or parent-child relation.”看出来的。不同意2楼的看法。
作者: daoyinger    时间: 2010-8-4 06:33

D is better,Yukichi is an authority who mention the Confucian and Western civilization that are discussed later.
作者: quellekind    时间: 2010-8-5 06:41

我还看见最后一段不是把那个上下等级的制度说成了是ladders。。。所以选了A introduce an analogy......
作者: wahabirds    时间: 2010-8-6 06:36

题干说的是In developing the passage..
所以那里虽然是个类比不错,但是起不到developing passage的作用

恩..还有偶个人认为这里的ladder是在说是一种promotion




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2