Board logo

标题: OG 53,两个并列的介词短语省略 [打印本页]

作者: winners    时间: 2005-3-19 09:18     标题: OG 53,两个并列的介词短语省略

OG 53. There is no consensus on what role, if any, is played by acid rain in slowing the growth or damaging forests in the eastern United States.

(A) slowing the growth or damaging

(B) the damage or the slowing of the growth of

(C) the damage to or the slowness of the growth of

(D) damaged or slowed growth of(E)

(E) damaging or slowing the growth of

The corrected sentence must make clear that both damaging and slowing the growth of refer to forests. E is the only choice that does so without introducing errors. In choice A, of is required after growth. In choices B and C, the use of the damage instead of damaging produces awkward and wordy constructions, and without to after damage, B is grammatically incomplete. In C, the slowness of does not convey the original sense that the rate of growth has been slowed by acid rain. Choice D also changes the meaning of the sentence by making both damaged and slowed refer to growth.

两个并列的介词短语可以省略相同的介词吗?比如:the A of and B of = the A and B of,对吗?

如语法上对,E的理解只有根据其逻辑意思了,对不?

damaging the growth of forest or slowing the growth of

or: damaging forest or slowing the growth of forest

谢谢!


作者: bnbf    时间: 2005-3-19 09:44

首先,这里不是介词结构. 应该是个动宾结构.

其次, V1+N, V2+N, 可以将V1, V2用and, or等连词连接, 然后加上名词. 所以E里面damage后面省略的只是forests, 不是介词of.


作者: apple1    时间: 2005-3-19 09:47

我对b and e还是有疑惑。我觉得,b 显示这个damage or slow of grow of forests的后果已经造成了。现在没有达成共识酸雨是不是原因之一。而e选项是,作为一个general case来讨论,到底酸雨对雨林又没有破坏的可能。不知道我理解的对否,请大家指正。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2