国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: TTgwd1-29 [打印本页]

作者: stucashS 时间: 2010-6-14 08:46 标题: TTgwd1-29

本帖最后由 stucashS 于 2010-6-14 08:47 编辑

Q29:

Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.
This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.
On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.
The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

B This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

C This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

D The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

E More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

这题答案是C。我选了个B。。。其实这题我不太读得懂题目意思。。哎。。求教牛牛们，这题如何推理呀~

作者: banglixing 时间: 2010-6-14 22:30

这是个A/C争议题

作者: linglingdan 时间: 2010-6-17 06:38

个人觉得是C。理由如下首先，要分清题目要你支持的是哪一方provides more support for the argument，，说的是让你支持反对Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers的人。而不是去支持Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers。A的话，支持了Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers。与题目要支持的相反。错
B的话，跟A同样的毛病。C的话，说大多数捐钱的，Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers，都没去联系过。反对Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers.也就是支持反对Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers的人。
请NN指教

作者: onedayling 时间: 2010-6-17 22:19

我也觉得是C.

多新的人捐钱才说明募捐成功,所以如果大部分捐款来自之前的捐款人,就说明募捐不成功.

文中结论是募捐不成功,若要支持该结论,则需要证明新的捐款人捐款占少或老的捐款人捐款占多.

A.学校找到很多新的捐款人 --> 削弱结论

B.新的捐款人捐款份额比老的多 --> 削弱结论

C.大部分捐款都是来自老的 --> 支持结论.

作者: stucashS 时间: 2010-6-18 06:47

哦~明白了~原来已经有前人讨论过了~gwd版本不一样竟然没找到。。多谢上面几位好人~

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)