Board logo

标题: 大全-c-2 [打印本页]

作者: mvmv90    时间: 2010-4-6 21:34     标题: 大全-c-2

Questions 1-2 are based on the following.

We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.

2.     Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

(A) The percentage of voters registered as independents is higher today than ever before.


(B) In a recent presidential campaign, for the first time ever, an independent candidate was invited to appear in a televised debate with the major-party candidates.


(C) Every current member of the U.S. Senate was elected as the candidate of one of the two major parties.


(D) In a recent opinion poll, most voters stated that a candidate’s party affiliation was an insignificant factor in judging his or her fitness for office.(C)


(E) In the last four years, the outcome of several statewide elections has been determined by the strength of the third-party vote.


怎么推出来的,没看懂!
作者: franker    时间: 2010-4-7 06:52

原文的no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years

答案c就是再重复一遍这句话

有人说两党制会玩完,

哦,作者就说不是这样的,是吧啦吧啦吧啦
作者: initusur    时间: 2010-4-7 22:04

要命的是:最后一句话 reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are

premature at best偶看不明白。有一个关键生词,demise,所以,心中惴惴不安,不知这句话

倒底起什么作用,它前的It seems clear that会不会说明它是一个结论,……

所以,只能放弃最后一句话来做题;但心中又老想最后一句话,于是就会障碍思维,难免出错。

做对了,也是猜测出来的。

最郁闷~~~
作者: gmaeeor    时间: 2010-4-8 22:04

最后一句话是结论, 说这种理论是不正确的, "媒体决定了大选的结果"

答案A, B,C是不相关因素, 答案 E 是起到了削弱作用, 说两党大选的结果是由第三党决定的,

只有D说明了, 大选的结果是有两党自己的AFFILIATION 决定, 而并非由他因决定的
作者: franker    时间: 2010-4-9 06:48

e应该是不对的

错在前面有两个莫名其妙的修饰词 the outcome of several statewide elections

而原文要说明的问题应该是有更广的范围,不应该仅仅是这几次选举
作者: elaineyll    时间: 2010-4-10 09:52

e应该是不对的

错在前面有两个莫名其妙的修饰词 the outcome of several statewide elections

而原文要说明的问题应该是有更广的范围,不应该仅仅是这几次选举




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2