国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: 求解OG-12-79 [打印本页]

作者: fangzep 时间: 2010-1-9 07:25 标题: 求解OG-12-79

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents,reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as freguent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered .Presently,no objective test for whiplash exists,so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified . Nevertheless ,these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported cases are spurious . Clearly , in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash , people often have incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given,the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes ；the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim

(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts ; the second is that conclusion

(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence ; the second is the main conclusion of the argument

(D) The first id a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument ; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding

(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument ;the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate

有谁能帮我分析下~谢谢啦

作者: fighing 时间: 2010-1-9 21:13

这种题不太擅长，我会选D。

第一句话是finding, 然后根据这个finding得出的implication是conclusion drawn by some commentators，即in the countries with the higher rates of reported cases are spurious. 但是作者不同意这个implication, 所以写了最后一句来反驳。

下次记得附上标准答案这样人家分析时心里会有底些

作者: fangzep 时间: 2010-1-12 07:19

你答案是对的
我想问下finding 和 evidence 有什么区别吗？第一个BF我就没判断对谢谢啦

作者: gmaeeor 时间: 2010-1-13 21:49

楼主，对于这种题需要紧紧抓住原文两句黑体间的逻辑关系，不必太在意选项里面的相似名

词，finding和evidence在这里不是区分选项的重点。

作者: fangzep 时间: 2010-1-15 07:09

恩~受教了~谢啦

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)