Board logo

标题: OG 12的3个语法题 [打印本页]

作者: chengzhiying    时间: 2009-12-22 21:16     标题: OG 12的3个语法题

37.Although schistosomiasis is not often fatal, it is so debilitating that it has become an economic drain on many developing countries
A.  it is so debilitating that it has become an economic
C. so debilitating is it as to become an economic
答案是A, 我想问的是选项C,书上的解释是the construction so x as to y is not a correct idiom,它的意思是说这样的表达方式都不对吗?不对吧

50. According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a "soft landing", followed by a gradual increase in business activities
原句是对的,我想问的是为什么要用had feared,为什么要用过去完成时呢,用feared一样可以说得通啊

56. many of the earliest known images of Hindu deities in India date from the time of Kushan Empire, fashioned either from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or, Gandharan grey schist
A. Empire, fashioned either from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or
原句是错的,但是书上的解释是:placement of the modifier fashioned....suggests that the Empire (the closest noun), not the images of the deities, was fashioned.但是从语法上来说,前面有逗号的话,fashioned要么是描述主句的主语,要么是修饰前面的整个句子,从来没有听说可以修饰前面句子的最后面的名词啊??

谢谢回复哦~~~~

作者: vevelay    时间: 2009-12-23 06:54

37。so as to是介词短语 后面不能再有主语 而且c的时态也不对 不能用现在时

C除非改为  it is so debilitating as to has become 才对

50。feared当然也说得通 但是had feared更好

56 either or要对等吧 either from 。。。or from 或者from either。。or

fashioned就因为离Empire太近 会产生歧义


作者: chengzhiying    时间: 2009-12-24 07:11

50.但是我觉得过去完成时态说不通啊,因为他通常是在有时间比较的时候才会出现的啊??出现在

这里难道不会太突兀了吗?

56.但是从语法上来看,会有这种歧义吗??


作者: chengzhiying    时间: 2009-12-24 07:13

但是so...as to这个句型也有啊
作者: vevelay    时间: 2009-12-24 20:23

so as to当然有 C选项怎么改 我上面已经写了

过去完成时表示 他们早些时候曾经恐惧的

但是从语法上来说,前面有逗号的话,fashioned要么是描述主句的主语,要么是修饰前面的整个句子,从来没有听说可以修饰前面句子的最后面的名词啊?? 这是哪个老师教的?

我一时举不出反例,但可以肯定没有这样的语法,就近修饰是很正常的


作者: chengzhiying    时间: 2009-12-25 07:02

“但是从语法上来说,前面有逗号的话,fashioned要么是描述主句的主语,要么是修饰前面的整个句子,从来没有听说可以修饰前面句子的最后面的名词啊?? 这是哪个老师教的?”
是可能修饰前面句子的靠近结尾的名词,OG上说的

作者: vevelay    时间: 2009-12-25 20:46

 对啊 正因为可能就近修饰而产生歧义 所以在这里这样用就不正确嘛




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2