Board logo

标题: prep-2--65 读不懂题目 [打印本页]

作者: waixiaoxi    时间: 2009-10-22 07:13     标题: prep-2--65 读不懂题目

65.  

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease.  Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population.  Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

(A) The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

(B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

(C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

(D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

(E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

题目是什么意思,百思不得其解!!!!!!!!!!


作者: yahooww    时间: 2009-10-22 20:20

能防止心脏病的一个什么措施,省的医疗上的钱是这个措施花费的四分之一,因此,这个措施没有经济意义
作者: xionghuixh    时间: 2009-10-23 06:56

治疗高血压可以防止日后的中风及心脏病从而省钱,但可以省下的钱只有治疗高血压费用本身的1/4。所有没有经济上的理由要治疗高血压。

选D。诊断中风与心脏病也要花很多钱


作者: lansere    时间: 2009-10-25 07:03

我怎么觉得A 应该是正确答案。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2