标题: GWD 4-20 [打印本页]
作者: dlmd 时间: 2005-2-2 15:30 标题: GWD 4-20
Q20:
Community activist: If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the opening of a huge SaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other small towns show that whenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the central shopping district of a small town, within five years the town has experienced the bankruptcies of more than a quarter of the stores in the shopping district.
The answer to which of the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist’s reasoning?
Have community activists in other towns successfully campaigned against the opening of a SaveAll store on the outskirts of their towns?
Do a large percentage of the residents of Morganville currently do almost all of their shopping at stores in Morganville?
In towns with healthy central shopping districts, what proportion of the stores in those districts suffer bankruptcy during a typical five-year period?
What proportion of the employees at the SaveAll store on the outskirts of Morganville will be drawn from Morganville?
Do newly opened SaveAll stores ever lose money during their first five years of operation
I feel the answer is B. If the residents of the town don't do shopping at stores in Morganville, then the activist's argument becomes pointless, since people won't come to the shopping district eventually, so his crticism on SaveAll cannot stand.
作者: mikejia 时间: 2005-2-2 21:52
B, 不好，诉诸于居民。呵呵。 如果居民现在还一直在stores in Morganville 不能决定周围应不应该开打折店。我不在中心买，不一定我就非的在saveall买啊。
C多好， 经济好的城市破场比例也是1/4的话，说明开saveall没坏处。
作者: dlmd 时间: 2005-2-4 15:03
" 我不在中心买，不一定我就非的在saveall买啊。"
nice explanation
Mike, do you have any tips for solving CR? It drives me crazy, sometimes i am thinking too much
作者: dlmd 时间: 2005-2-5 11:20
I guess Mike is enjoying his weekend now, ^_^
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |