innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting

ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets,

greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

 

T-9-Q9
The primary purpose of the passage is to

A.      explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated

B.      propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage

C.     present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy

D.     make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced

E.      suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

 

请教一下~~~~答案是C，但是ABC之间的区分不是很明显啊