Board logo

标题: T-9-Q9-Q12 请教~~~~ [打印本页]

作者: xiangchane    时间: 2009-10-12 06:52     标题: T-9-Q9-Q12 请教~~~~

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such
 
innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting
ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets,
greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.
 

T-9-Q9
The primary purpose of the passage is to

A.      explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated

B.      propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage

C.     present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy

D.     make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced

E.      suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

 

请教一下~~~~答案是C,但是ABC之间的区分不是很明显啊


作者: yahooww    时间: 2009-10-12 19:31

试着解释一下哈:

章从P何G两个人开始,对前面的结论进行转折,并未全部否认,因为see this development as laudable (值得称赞的)but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future.以后通过indeed、moreover等列举了可能带来的结果,即C


作者: ferferzor    时间: 2009-10-13 06:48

再问一下,我觉得a就很对啊……为什么不选a呢




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2