Board logo

标题: GWD 21-17 [打印本页]

作者: qurssrou    时间: 2009-10-6 22:31     标题: GWD 21-17

GWD 21-Q15 to Q18:

      In her account of unmarried

       women’s experiences in colonial

       Philadelphia, Wulf argues that edu-

Line       cated young women, particularly

  (5)      Quakers, engaged in resistance to

patriarchal marriage by exchanging

poetry critical of marriage, copying

verse into their commonplace

books.  Wulf suggests that this

 (10)      critique circulated beyond the

daughters of the Quaker elite

and middle class, whose com-

monplace books she mines,

proposing that Quaker schools

 (15)      brought it to many poor female

students of diverse backgrounds.

      Here Wulf probably overstates

Quaker schools’ impact.  At least

three years’ study would be

 (20)      necessary to achieve the literacy

       competence necessary to grapple

       with the material she analyzes.

In 1765, the year Wulf uses to

demonstrate the diversity of

 (25)      Philadelphia’s Quaker schools,

128 students enrolled in these

schools.  Refining Wulf’s numbers

by the information she provides

on religious affiliation, gender, and

 (30)      length of study, it appears that only

about 17 poor non-Quaker girls

were educated in Philadelphia’s

       Quaker schools for three years or

longer.  While Wulf is correct that

 (35)    a critique of patriarchal marriage

circulated broadly, Quaker schools

probably cannot be credited with

instilling these ideas in the lower

      classes.  Popular literary satires

 (40)     on marriage had already landed

on fertile ground in a multiethnic

population that embodied a wide

range of marital beliefs and

practices.  These ethnic- and

 (45)      class-based traditions them-

selves challenged the legitimacy

of patriarchal marriage.


Q17:

The author of the passage implies which of the following about the poetry mentioned in the first paragraph?

             

  1. Wulf exaggerates the degree to which young women from an elite background regarded the poetry as providing a critique of marriage.
  2. The circulation of the poetry was confined to young Quaker women.
  3. Young women copied the poetry into their commonplace books because they interpreted it as providing a desirable model of unmarried life.
  4. The poetry’s capacity to influence popular attitudes was restricted by the degree of literacy necessary to comprehend it.
  5. The poetry celebrated marital beliefs and practices that were in opposition to patriarchal marriage.
搜索了以前的帖子好像认为是C,但是GWD22的答案是D.我认为D肯定是错的,C有点道理但是也不对。我的意见是E.
理由如下:
原文是说W研究Unmarried woman,发现了quaker的这些富裕小姐们把一些诗copy到commonplace books.然后W argue that critique影响了在quaker school读书的穷人家孩子。但是作者认为W夸大了school的作用,后面就解释了一番。
先看C,有道理,但是原文是说

that educated young women, particularly Quakers, engaged in resistance to patriarchal marriage by....

然后C是说这些女人是因为 they interpreted it as providing a desirable model of unmarried life.

但是原文没说这些人持有了unmarried life的想法,这些critique只是反对家长制的婚姻。

所以我觉得E好像更有道理,就是这些女人抱有的婚姻观是和家长制婚姻相反的。。。

不知道这样解释对不对。。。达人分析下。。。


作者: phdmass    时间: 2009-10-8 06:50

这题我也看了很久,怎么看都觉得D是无关的,我选E

有哪位NN能指点一下啊?????


作者: bobiouous    时间: 2009-10-9 06:52

E选项 celebrate有点怪,因为这些书应该属於讽刺 literary satires

我觉得作者在第二段最後二句说:

Popular literary satires on marriage had already landed on fertile ground in a multiethnic population....
点出多种族背景是个肥土

These ethnic- and class-based traditions themselves challenged the legitimacy of patriarchal marriage. 意味多种族对婚姻的不同看法(各自的传统)挑战 patriarchal marriage。

他讲这些就是为了要说:既然风行反
patriarchal marriage,但是这些commonplace books要看懂需要有一定的文学素养,如果poor girls看不懂,那为何会风行勒?原因就是多种族背景才是重点,popular literary satires是一个 extra助力,即使poor girls看不懂也没关系,其本身的种族背景传统就已经挑战了。

所以我选D

一点意见,互相交流

作者: heilongh    时间: 2009-10-10 06:49

D的出处

At least three years’ study would be necessary to achieve the literacy competence necessary to grapple with the material she analyzes

E没提到poetry celebrated marital beliefs and practices

哎~我也做错了






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2