Board logo

标题: 请教LSAT-2-4-22 [打印本页]

作者: grossmun    时间: 2009-9-22 07:12     标题: 请教LSAT-2-4-22

All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very nearsighted. So I must be a genius.

Which one of the following exhibits both of the logical flaws exhibited in the argument above?

 

(b) All chickens have beaks. This bird has a beak. So this bird must be a chicken.

 

(d) John is extremely happy , so he must be extremely tall because all tall people are happy.

 

答案是D,可我选的是B。为什么B不行呢?谢谢!!!


作者: kevin_8p    时间: 2009-9-22 21:04

My understanding.

The question is talking about a character of someone/something.  B is not.  But D is.


作者: woodlittle    时间: 2009-9-23 06:53

 Say, it doesn't refer to whether I am one of people, but rather I am intelligent people.

Just be careful for such short tricky quesions.


作者: carollai    时间: 2009-9-24 06:56

All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very nearsighted. So I must be a genius.

犯了A能推出 B,则有B则有A

典型的充分必要条件错误


作者: oldereaper    时间: 2009-9-25 20:58

少看LSAT, 会走火入魔的.

简单分析一下. 问题中有”both of the logical flaws”看到没有, 所以答案要符合这两个flaws.

Flaw1: 逆命题. A is B 推不出 B is A. 比如: human has 2 eyes不等于having 2 eyes is human.

Flaw2: 走极端. A is B 推不出Very A is Very B. 比如: All intelligent people are nearsighted推不出

Genius (Very intelligent)就是very nearsighted.

看答案. B中有1没有2. D中有1有2, flaws2为extremely happy is extremely tall.


作者: grossmun    时间: 2009-9-26 08:00

 谢谢几位的分析!我发现我对逻辑题还理解的不是很深入,我想我要多下下工夫才行.




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2