Board logo

标题: [求助]OG- 37 不是很明白 [打印本页]

作者: cattery    时间: 2009-9-13 09:30     标题: [求助]OG- 37 不是很明白

 

Passage 2 (37)

—— OG 10th - 37, 即OG 11th - 2

A recent study has provided clues to predator-prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene era. Researchers compared the number of tooth fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth fractures in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000 years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles. The breakage frequencies in the extinct species were strikingly higher than those in the present-day species.

In considering possible explanations for this finding, the researchers dismissed(负评价) demographic bias because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples. They rejected(负评价) preservational bias because  a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits. They ruled out(负评价) local bias because breakage data obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar to the La Brea data. The explanation they consider most plausible(正评价即TS) is behavioral differences between extinct and present-day carnivores-in particular, more contact between the teeth of predators and the bones of prey due to more thorough consumption of carcasses by the extinct speciesTS. Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.

 

我不是很清楚,这里的breakage 不是磨损的意思吗?

breakage磨损度 extinct > present 是要解释的现象

而后来的prey availability was low and intense competition, high rate of carass theft是什么意思? 供怪兽们可捕食的量低,竞争高, 源于捕食者的密度造成的尸体争夺率高 这些说明了什么? 我不觉得这些可以造成extinct的怪兽breakage > present的怪兽的啊?

 

还有这里的a total absence of breakage 是什么意思? 为什么这个可以rejected preservational bias ?  preservation bias是什么偏差?

 

我在这篇文章进入混沌状态好久,请大家帮帮忙,多谢了!


作者: pite82    时间: 2009-9-13 20:58

我个人觉得,文章的意思是想说明breakage高是由于Predator对于Prey躯干非常好的消化造成的,我猜连什么骨头都咬碎吃下去的这种;而不是由于Predator的数量密度过高而造成的Prey数量不够,从而引起对于Prey的彼此争斗或者盗窃等原因造成的
纯属个人意见,希望大牛们可以多多赐教~

作者: cattery    时间: 2009-9-14 06:43

不是很理解absence of breakage是 什么意思? “没有磨损”?

保存偏差 的 排除 是因为 两种extinct species 的total absence of breakage证明了化石碎片不是由于坑的磨损?


作者: pite82    时间: 2009-9-15 06:40

我觉得今天看到的牙齿化石磨损可能有2个原因,1个是当时就磨损了,另外1个就是后来变成化石后由于保护不当而磨损的。既然在一批次中发现了完全没有磨损的化石,就可以排除第2个原因,也就得出了第1个才是正确的
作者: cattery    时间: 2009-9-16 06:42

我明白了

 

你所说的consumption含义了
远古怪兽的牙 之所以被磨损的如此严重,主要是由于它们的生活饮食习惯
 
远古怪兽吃东西 连骨头一起吃——费牙
现在的兽兽吃东西文明一些——吃肉就好了
 
而造成以上饮食习惯的原因是:
 
either
1. 吃的东西少(prey low)
or
2. 捕食兽兽密度大造成了 intense competition over kill 和 high carcass theft 对么?

  competition 是 predator 发出的还是 prey 发出的? 为什么?


作者: pite82    时间: 2009-9-17 06:56

应该是Predator发出的,因为文中说due to relatively high predator densities.
然后发现我原来的理解也有些问题,更正一下在2楼的回复:“我个人觉得,文章的意思是想说明breakage高是由于Predator对于Prey躯干非常好的消化造成的,我猜连什么骨头都咬碎吃下去的这种;而不是由于Predator的数量密度过高而造成的Prey数量不够,从而引起对于Prey的彼此争斗或者盗窃等原因造成的” 红字部分属于科学家的推断,2种可能都存在,文中并没有明确否定,谢谢讨论哈

作者: cattery    时间: 2009-9-17 21:51

嗯 差不多明白了,多谢




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2