Board logo

标题: GWD-2-Q34求助:现在完成时分词形式到底能不能做定语修饰? [打印本页]

作者: fighing    时间: 2009-9-6 08:45     标题: GWD-2-Q34求助:现在完成时分词形式到底能不能做定语修饰?

NASA’s methodical approach to the exploration of Mars has not yet answered the questions of whether biological life forms ever emerged on Mars and whether, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, those traces can still exist in some moist recesses of the cold and arid planet.

 

A.   and whether, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, those traces can

B.    and whether, if it is presumed that such life forms left some fossil traces to begin with, can those traces

C.   and whether, presuming such life forms left fossil traces to begin with, those traces

D.   and, presuming such life forms did leave some fossil traces to begin with, if they can

E.    and, presuming such life forms to have left fossil traces to begin with, if they

答案为A,我选了C

疑惑:

白勇的语法全解上说现在完成时形式的分词不能做定语修饰名词,可是A中 having left 。。。不就是修饰life forms了吗


作者: daoyings    时间: 2009-9-6 21:06

 我觉得这里的having left不是做的定语

你想想定语是修饰成分,也就是去掉之后句子依然完整,但是你把A中的having去掉后, presuming such life forms. 已经不是一个完整的句子了,个人觉着这里是做补语

其实也就相当于presuming that such life forms have left some fossil trace ... 应该可以看出来不是修饰关系


作者: gifiler    时间: 2009-9-7 07:00

宾语从句的that是不能省略的,情态动词也不能随意去掉
作者: 乱草花儿    时间: 2009-9-8 06:45

郁闷阿,这个题究竟选什么?哪位大牛冒个泡?
新东方的讲解网站上居然说选B,理由如下:
“划线部分第一个词是and, 这决定了前后必须对称,由于划线部分前面是whether,所以D和E后面的if都错了。A
和C有个非常严重的错误,presuming这个分词是没有动作的发出者的,逻辑发生错误。”

我只知道DE一定错...到底选什么?


作者: daoyings    时间: 2009-9-8 20:51

B里面都不是陈述语序...
作者: sunfloweryhf    时间: 2009-9-9 13:07

 c错误。whether 引导的实际上是壮语前置的句子,whether those traces can still exist in some moist recesses of the cold and arid planet, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with。
如果这么放置,你能察觉为什么c错误了吗?

作者: oldereaper    时间: 2009-9-10 06:47

选A

and whether(, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, )those traces

can

whether those traces can...;presuming的主语是隐含的

B里边“if it is presumed that”太啰嗦了;whether can those traces 也不成立


作者: rearn    时间: 2009-9-15 06:52

同意楼上的,当中的就是插入语,跳掉不看,就是and whether those traces can,而且can是情态动词,省略了意思就有点变化了

作者: fighing    时间: 2009-9-15 20:45

对,现在我知道情态动词can尽量不能省,但是对于having dong这个是否是后置定语修饰,还是没能得到合理清楚的解释啊




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2