A city plans to attract new citizens with new housing and new facilities such as parks, recreation centers, and libraries.  One component of the city's plan is to require that developers seeking permission to build this new housing provide these additional facilities at no cost to the city.

Which of the following, if true, would point to a possible flaw in the city's plan?

(A) Developers would pass along their costs to the buyer, thereby raising the cost of housing units beyond the ability of likely purchasers to afford them.

(B) Light, nonpolluting industries have located in the area, offering more jobs and better-paying jobs than do the more-established industries in the area.

(C) Other towns and cities nearby have yet to embark on any comparable plans to attract new citizens.

(D) Most developers see the extra expense of providing municipal facilities as simply one of the many costs of doing business.

(E) Studies show that purchasers of new houses, especially first-time buyers, rank recreational resources as an important factor in deciding to buy a particular house.

对于A,不是很理解,大家帮忙解释一下吧!

政府想要凭借新建的住宅和一些便民设施来吸引居民迁居到这个地方

官方就想本来这些设施应该政府出资修建的

但是它计划要求建筑商建这个设施

可是正如A选项所说的

房产商会将这个增加的成本转借给消费者

原本建这些作为政府出资的设施相当于公共财产面向居民的

结果政府的这个计划却造成房价上升

反而不利于吸引居民了

plan的目的是attract new citizens,
A选项说developers将费用以提高价格的方式转移到买家身上，高房价就没有了吸引力了，于是plan的目的就达不成了

B加强了
C无关类比（讨论其他例子来类比讨论对象，也是我们写argument时候常用来批判的一宗罪）
Ddeveloper怎么看待这个plan中的项目与题目没有关系
E说purchasers对recreational resources的态度，也是与提问没有什么关系的。

我的理解是这样的，希望和大家探讨

此题要注意结论中的后半句 :

build this new housing provide these additional facilities  at no cost to the city.

只有A选项和结论中要去寻找的Flaw有关。

考场中做题没有那么多时间去每个选项斟酌分析，，  要注意做题技巧！