Board logo

标题: [求助]GWD32-Q25-Q28 [打印本页]

作者: gaoshenglan    时间: 2009-7-21 20:43     标题: [求助]GWD32-Q25-Q28

GWD32-Q25-Q28- 大全Passage 87 (2/15)

There is widespread belief that the emergence of giant industries has been accompanied by an equivalent surge in industrial research. A recent study of important inventions made since the turn of the century reveals that more than half were the product of individual inventors working alone, independent of organized industrial research. While industrial laboratories contributed such important products as nylon and transistors, independent inventors developed air conditioning, the automatic transmission, the jet engine, the helicopter, insulin, and streptomycin. Still other inventions, such as stainless steel, television, silicones, and Plexiglas (Plexiglas: n.树脂玻璃(多用以制造飞机座舱罩、镜片等)) were developed through the combined efforts of individuals and laboratory teams.

Despite these finding, we are urged to support monopolistic power on the grounds that such power creates an environment supportive of innovation. We are told that the independent inventor, along with the small firm, cannot afford to undertake the important research needed to improve our standard of living while protecting our diminishing resources; that only the giant corporation or conglomerate, with its prodigious assets, can afford the kind of expenditures that produce the technological advances vital to economic progress. But when we examine expenditures for research, we find that of the more than $35 billion spent each year in this country, almost two-thirds is spent by the federal government. More than half of this government expenditure is funneled into military research and product development, accounting for the enormous increase in spending in such industries as nuclear energy, aircraft, missiles, and electronics. There are those who consider it questionable that these defense-linked research projects will either improve our standard of living or do much to protect our diminishing resources.

Recent history has demonstrated that we may have to alter our longstanding conception of the process actuated by competition. The price variable, once perceived as the dominant aspect of the process, is now subordinate to the competition of the new product, the new business structure, and the new technology. While it can be assumed that in a highly competitive industry not dominated by single corporation, investment in innovation—a risky and expensive budget item—might meet resistance from management and stockholders concerned about cost-cutting, efficient organization, and large advertising budgets, it would be an egregious error to equate the monopolistic producer with bountiful expenditures on research. Large-scale enterprises tend to operate more comfortably in stable and secure circumstances, and their managerial bureaucracies tend to promote the status quo and resist the threat implicit in change. Moreover, in some cases, industrial giants faced with little or no competition seek to avoid the capital loss resulting from obsolescence by deliberately obstructing technological progress. By contrast, small firms undeterred by large investments in plant and capital equipment often aggressively pursue new techniques and new products, investing in innovation in order to expand their market shares.

The conglomerates are not, however, completely except from strong competitive pressures. There are instances in which they too must compete with another industrial Goliath, and then their weapons may include large expenditures for innovation.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) advocate an increase in government support of organized industrial research

(B) point out a common misconception about the relationship between the extent of industrial research and the growth of monopolistic power in industry

(C) describe the inadequacies of small firms in dealing with the important matter of research and innovation

(D) show that America’s strength depends upon individual ingenuity and resourcefulnessB

(E) encourage free-market competition among industrial giants

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q26

According to the passage, important inventions of the twentieth century

(A) were produced largely as a result of governmental support for military weapons research and development

(B) came primarily from the huge laboratories of monopolistic industries

(C) were produced at least as frequently by independent inventors as by research teams

(D) have greater impact on smaller firms than on conglomeratesC

(E) sometimes adversely affect our standard of living and diminish our natural resources

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Q27

It can be inferred from the passage that the author

(A) has little confidence in the ability of monopolistic industry to produce the important inventions of the future

(B) would rather see the federal government spend money on social services than on the defense establishment

(C) favors a conservative approach to innovation and places trust in conglomerates to provide efficient production

(D) feels that price should still be the dominant variable in the competitive processA

(E) believes that excessive competition is a deterrent to innovation

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q28

The passage contains information that answers which of the following questions?

I.      What portion of the research dollar in this country is spent each year by the federal government?

II.    Under what circumstances is an industrial giant likely to invest heavily in innovation?

III.   Why might a monopolistic producer want to suppress an innovation?

(A) I only

(B) II only

the keys are BCAE

the passage is from 大全, the passage seems not difficult to understand, but i made 3 mistakes in 4 questions... 

somebody have done this recently? wanna discuss a bit about the questions?

i was wondering why no.27 is not E? 


作者: chouliulu    时间: 2009-7-22 06:43

27题我也选了E。回头再看,文中并没有提到excessive competition,只是说highly competition.

而选项A在文中有很好的对应:

it would be an egregious error to equate the monopolistic producer with bountiful expenditures on research.


作者: grassgreen    时间: 2009-7-22 20:32

27题E选项只说的问题的一面。

因为竞争激烈,很多企业出于成本,有效管理等因素的考虑不敢轻易投资技术革新。

有些龙头企业根本也不受竞争威胁,更加安于现状。

有部分小企业想要通过创新来扩张市场份额。

而E这样笼统的对竞争做出的评价,不可选。

A是关乎一个作者态度问题

作者整篇文章先陈述现象,再支持,然后转变观点,最后用however打个圆场。A就是作者对垄断工业的技术革新所抱有的总体不乐观的态度。


作者: cheryong    时间: 2009-7-23 06:58

Q27 A
文章第三段如下黑体字,正式A的对应
E选项3楼解释的很清楚
Recent history has demonstrated that we may have to alter our longstanding conception of the process actuated by competition. The price variable, once perceived as the dominant aspect of the process, is now subordinate to the competition of the new product, the new business structure, and the new technology. While it can be assumed that in a highly competitive industry not dominated by single corporation, investment in innovation—a risky and expensive budget item—might meet resistance from management and stockholders concerned about cost-cutting, efficient organization, and large advertising budgets, it would be an egregious error to equate the monopolistic producer with bountiful expenditures on research. Large-scale enterprises tend to operate more comfortably in stable and secure circumstances, and their managerial bureaucracies tend to promote the status quo and resist the threat implicit in change. Moreover, in some cases, industrial giants faced with little or no competition seek to avoid the capital loss resulting from obsolescence by deliberately obstructing technological progress. By contrast, small firms undeterred by large investments in plant and capital equipment often aggressively pursue new techniques and new products, investing in innovation in order to expand their market shares.

作者: wechinas    时间: 2009-7-24 06:38

答案说13是A, 我一开始也选的A,但是后来改为E.
因为A原文没有明确说,而且我觉得作者没有怀疑过the ability of monopolistic industry,只是对它们的作用有所保留,而且三段不是说独裁公司没有能力,而是说它们不愿意。
E选项文中提到过
“ it can be assumed that in a highly competitive industry ... , investment in innovation ... might meet resistance from management and stockholders concerned about ...
不知道我的看法对不对?
作者: lilyblue_zl    时间: 2009-7-25 08:40

注意你的it can be assumed that...那句,前半句是while开头的,所以重心其实还是在后半句:it would be an egregious error to equate the monopolistic producer with bountiful expenditures on research.




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2