Board logo

标题: GWD-2-11 [打印本页]

作者: guafafd    时间: 2005-1-11 19:58     标题: GWD-2-11

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservative. However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a) These wine makers have been able to duplicate teh preservatives effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine;

b) Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

c) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added;

d) Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction;

e) Sulfites are not natually present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allegic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

答案是E,但是我觉得选D,理由是它是建立在酒里面没有其他东西引起过敏反应。而答案E,跟他们生产的AMOUNT有什么关系呢?

请指教!


作者: himba    时间: 2005-1-11 20:02

我也有点疑问,因为我看答案怎么是D啊,但是我却选了E

说说我的想法吧:E的意思好像是在这些厂商生产的酒中,不会自然产生足够多S这个东西以至于引起某些人过敏。这个选项如果去掉not看,就变成了即便厂商不添加S,这东西也会自发生成导致人们过敏。于是S不会自发形成就是人们可以喝这些厂商的酒的必要条件了。

至于D,我觉得和A有相似之处,大概都是说除了S不会有别的东西导致过敏。但是文中指的是那些专门对S过敏的人,可以喝不含S的酒。我觉得他们并不对除了S之外的东西过敏,所以即便有其他东西可能是致敏物,但是这些人并不会受影响。所以这两个应该是无关选项吧。

我是这么理解的,哪位大牛指导一下吧!


作者: StephanieYun    时间: 2005-1-15 20:08

题目出处是哪里的, 最好说明,另外是答案的准确性也值得讨论。我觉得应该选E.






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2