Q35 to Q37:
(This passage was excerpted from material
published in 1996.)
When a large body strikes a planet
or moon, material is ejected, thereby
creating a hole in the planet and a local
Line deficit of mass. This deficit shows up
(5) as a gravity anomaly: the removal of
the material that has been ejected to
make the hole results in an area of
slightly lower gravity than surrounding
areas. One would therefore expect that
(10) all of the large multi-ring impact basins
on the surface of Earth’s Moon would
show such negative gravity anomalies,
since they are, essentially, large holes
in the lunar surface. Yet data collected
(15) in 1994 by the Clementine spacecraft
show that many of these lunar basins
have no anomalously low gravity and
some even have anomalously high
gravity. Scientists speculate that early
(20) in lunar history, when large impactors
struck the Moon’s surface, causing
millions of cubic kilometers of crustal
debris to be ejected, denser material
from the Moon’s mantle rose up
(25) beneath the impactors almost imme-
diately, compensating for the ejected
material and thus leaving no low gravity
anomaly in the resulting basin. Later,
however, as the Moon grew cooler
(30) and less elastic, rebound from large
impactors would have been only partial
and incomplete. Thus today such
gravitational compensation probably
would not occur: the outer layer of
the Moon is too cold and stiff.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q35:
According to the passage, the gravitational compensation referred to in line 33 is caused by which of the following?
Answer: E
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
The passage suggests that if the scientists mentioned in line 19 are correct in their speculations, the large multi-ring impact basins on the Moon with the most significant negative gravity anomalies probably
Answer: A
为什么不是E(用绿色标出),我觉得A和原文相反啊(用红色标出)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q37:
Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
Answer: C
A好像和B是关联的。月球早期(A的说法)因为冲撞,所以crustal debris都冒出来(B的说法),所以large multi-ring impact basins所以没有形成。
E不行的原因是后来月球不elastic了,所以gravitational compensation不会发生。但是它没有讲到multi-ring impact basins的问题。
反正我这题没做对
36.A
Later
however, as the Moon grew cooler
and less elastic, rebound from large
impactors would have been only partial
and incomplete. Thus today such
gravitational compensation probably
would not occur: the outer layer of
the Moon is too cold and stiff.
是一个因果关系:由于(AS)月亮变得越来越冷且没有弹性,导致从反弹物越小或仅仅部分,(THUS)重力补充不足.可以推出以前的负重力异常情况是不发生的.(以前月亮是有弹性且不冷的)
36)
If the scientists are right, then their speculation can hold that gravity compensation made up the deficits of mass lost in a collision. In Line 33-36, it said such gravity compensation might not happen again, because the outer layer becomes cool and rigid. Therefore, any basins showing negative gravity must have happened after the outer layers became cool and rigid. So we can imply they couldn’t happen very earlier when the outer layers are elastic.
搂主是不是把with the most significant negative gravity anomalies 看成 gravitational compensation 或者类似的吧。反正是看反了。
问题问重量的负异常. 早期的月亮很有弹性,只能造成正异常后者没有异常的,后来老了硬了不行了,撞上了才没法进行重力补偿, 彩绘有负异常。
言之有理。
这段文字意在解释:1)significant negative gravity anomalies 为何没有发生;2)gravitational compensation 只在月亮年纪轻轻皮肤有弹性时才会发生。
Assumption: 正是gravitational compensation 补偿了negative gravity anomalies 。
我在做题时也同样看反了。
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |