Board logo

标题: gwd-7-38 [打印本页]

作者: 快乐公主    时间: 2005-1-10 15:24     标题: gwd-7-38

Journalist: WEll-knowm businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy y submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

B. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements?

E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernational elections?

答案B,我选的E. 我觉得B说提交list如果是参加竞选的唯一方式的话,那B人很可能要参加竞选了.但应该是说如果参加竞选是提交list的唯一结果那才对呀.

再看E.看以前竞选前,他有没有提交list.因为以前他不参加竞选是已知的,如果他以前也是在别人竞选前提交list,这次提交就不能说明他要竞选.所以我认为B对

NN怎么看?


作者: StephanieYun    时间: 2005-1-15 20:28

E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernational elections?

这个有没有打错什么单词啊。怎么有个单词我居然不认识。

这个选项是无关选项,请看看。

至于B, 最好的情况应该是“公开财务的唯一目的是...”,而B现在说“满足竞选财务公开要求的唯一途径是......”,已经是较好的补充。比较而言,如果其他三个选项不比 B 更好。

所以请搂主发问一定要完整、准确地把题目和选项都写出来,这是对别人劳动的尊重。不然可能在不会有人回答这种不着边际的问题了。


作者: 快乐公主    时间: 2005-1-15 23:45

以下是引用StephanieYun在2005-1-15 20:28:00的发言:

E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernational elections?

这个有没有打错什么单词啊。怎么有个单词我居然不认识。

这个选项是无关选项,请看看。

至于B, 最好的情况应该是“公开财务的唯一目的是...”,而B现在说“满足竞选财务公开要求的唯一途径是......”,已经是较好的补充。比较而言,如果其他三个选项不比 B 更好。

所以请搂主发问一定要完整、准确地把题目和选项都写出来,这是对别人劳动的尊重。不然可能在不会有人回答这种不着边际的问题了。

谢谢斑竹。sorry for my fault. I will pay attention to it! [em04]




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2