Board logo

标题: 4、22巴黎一战740 [打印本页]

作者: blaguer    时间: 2009-4-23 13:32     标题: 4、22巴黎一战740

今天真是。。。无话说。

昨天晚上怎么都睡不着,3点44分的看手表的时候人还很清醒,心里想肯定完蛋了。我估计4点30才睡着。早上7点15分起床,洗个澡后,本来去赶工交车,一到车站就踏掉一班,结果足足等了12分钟才来第二班。然后换地铁,不晓得怎么回事,坐过头了一站,结果又往回坐。到了地铁站后,出来,路又走错方向 (该死的Saint Denis站居然有2个凯旋们样的东西,一个通向考试中心,另一个通向另一个方向),然后又往回走。最后是,我居然第一个到考场!无语。

现奉上少量JJ.

“Research indicates that those who exercise regularly are hospitalized less than half as often as those who don’t exercise. By providing a well-equipped gym for Saluda’s municipal employees, we should be able to reduce the cost of our group health insurance coverage by approximately 50% and thereby achieve a balanced town budget.”

Issue是说政府不应该去规划公司的政策,应当让公司自己去规划,这样社会才会收益。

根号3的-k次方,小于81分之1,问k=?

1. K是小于12的奇数 2. K是小于12的质数

还有一题算一个公司在某一周产量的,很饶,说公司生产P和Q 2种产品,在上周,P占总产量的10%,Q占90% 本周Q生产和上周同样的量,P又是一个什么的量使得一个等式成立,最后说,2周总共生产了9000个,问P这周比上周多生产了多少个,答案1000,我确定。

阅读碰见了3篇JJ,最后一篇不是JJ,但是不难。说的是风对地球时间的影响。说风会影响山脉,然后山脉又怎么怎么的,结果使得地球的时间在几年内走慢多少多少豪秒,然后又被风影响,又走快走快多少多少毫秒,结果地球时间得以保持。但是后来研究者又自己推翻自己的观点,说风不会影响,因为什么什么,然后说正镇的原因其实是什么什么
题目:地球五年内会怎么样:先变慢几秒在变快几秒(绝对不能选constant);文章结构:很明显,自己推翻自己的结论,然后提出一个新的结论。还有就是作者提出的正镇的原因的一个细节题,原文的话,直接搬。

语法感觉考平行结构特别多。我记得我第一题就是语法,很奇怪。我选择的是for sb. to like sth.因为后面有一个同样的结构说for sb. to do。不过还是感觉 for sb. to like很奇怪

逻辑。碰见了PREP里面一个一样的题目:

Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines.  It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market.  Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

 

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

 

(A) Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted

(B) Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined

(C) Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the cost of extracting uranium from seawater

(D) Whether the total amount of uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land

(E) Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater


还碰见一题目说旅馆的:说税收增加,但是rate和总amount都没变,解释?旅客待的时间更加长





欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2