Board logo

标题: 855-6-23 [打印本页]

作者: mjiirggh    时间: 2004-12-7 12:21     标题: 855-6-23

23. Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant

(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds not to hire the applicant

(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them

(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired(A)

(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

答案没问题,想问下A和B中for not hiring 与 not to hire 在这里有什么优劣之别吗?二者用法上有什么不同?


作者: ppp1    时间: 2004-12-7 12:24

be grounds for doing is an idiom, not the be grounds to do




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2