标题: og11-38 [打印本页]
作者: xueguelili 时间: 2009-1-15 19:13 标题: og11-38
有过工作相关事故的员工，o公司比p公司少。（比较的是人数，而不是事故数。）
那么如果o公司里某些员工一个人就发生好几次的话，实际事故数可能大于p公司。
因此，d答案也是weaken了结论的啊。
请帮我看看，我的理解哪里出问题了？
作者: xueguelili 时间: 2009-1-16 07:05
Questions 37-38 are based on the following:
Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.
38. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.
(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.
(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees of Company O.
(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident.
(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single machine.
作者: 小巧玲珑 时间: 2009-1-17 07:13
D 不一定会达到你所说的结果
如果F的选项 由于O的员工发生了不只一次事故,导致总的事故数量超过了P. 还是可以做weaken的
D并不是F的必然条件
作者: Economics 时间: 2009-1-17 20:53
答案是B吧 但这题干扰选项较多，请教高手怎么在最快的时间里选出正确答案，排除干扰选项呢
作者: hebbechou 时间: 2009-1-18 07:37
两个事物对比
support：他们在其它地方无差异
weaken：除了原文列出的因素外，还有其它未提及的因素造成了他们对比不当
作者: bioliwu 时间: 2009-1-19 07:06
我也认为比较的是事故数。
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |