Board logo

标题: gwd 16 3 关于were it for [打印本页]

作者: feierer    时间: 2008-11-20 07:29     标题: gwd 16 3 关于were it for

Q3:

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.

 

 

  1. instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse
  2. instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight
  3. a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight
  4. a star would collapse under its own weight
  5. its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

问一下 were it not for 的用法,以前记得学过的。。

这个表示方法只能倒装么?

it在这里指代什么呢?

答案c


作者: BCorBentley    时间: 2008-11-20 21:16

是if it were not for的虚拟倒装。
作者: feierer    时间: 2008-11-21 07:14

恩了解, 它只能倒装么?it有指代意义么?
作者: anchorets    时间: 2008-11-21 19:10

问一下  为啥是C  不是选D


作者: emma-maple    时间: 2008-11-24 07:22

指代主句主语。

这个结构可以不倒装。。。


作者: feierer    时间: 2008-11-24 19:16

意识到前面第二个问题有点傻。。

不过我感到这里的it 可能不是指代主语

比如说,were it not for him, I would have died. 

虽然上句是我胡诌的,但是感觉上应该是符合语法的吧?

(可能也是出于这个原因把stars提前一面引起混淆)






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2