标题: gwd 16 3 关于were it for [打印本页]
作者: feierer 时间: 2008-11-20 07:29 标题: gwd 16 3 关于were it for
Q3:
Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.
- instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse
- instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight
- a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight
- a star would collapse under its own weight
- its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse
问一下 were it not for 的用法,以前记得学过的。。
这个表示方法只能倒装么?
it在这里指代什么呢?
答案c
作者: BCorBentley 时间: 2008-11-20 21:16
是if it were not for的虚拟倒装。
作者: feierer 时间: 2008-11-21 07:14
恩了解, 它只能倒装么?it有指代意义么?
作者: anchorets 时间: 2008-11-21 19:10
问一下 为啥是C 不是选D
作者: emma-maple 时间: 2008-11-24 07:22
指代主句主语。
这个结构可以不倒装。。。
作者: feierer 时间: 2008-11-24 19:16
意识到前面第二个问题有点傻。。
不过我感到这里的it 可能不是指代主语
比如说,were it not for him, I would have died.
虽然上句是我胡诌的,但是感觉上应该是符合语法的吧?
(可能也是出于这个原因把stars提前一面引起混淆)
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |