Board logo

标题: GWD21-Q28: 傻傻的问 [打印本页]

作者: flyinggemini    时间: 2008-9-29 07:23     标题: GWD21-Q28: 傻傻的问

GWD21-Q28:

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved.  They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.  They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
  2. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by that evidence.
  3. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
  4. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
  5. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.这道题怎么看都是B, 答案怎么是啊A?

作者: legendend    时间: 2008-9-29 21:03

我没有做过这个题目,但是觉得A是对的呀。你说说为什么不对呢?

文章如是说
银行高管对银行的股票进行回购,人们对银行倒闭的传言也就随之驱散。人们的理由是那些高管在银行很有威望和信誉(连他们都买自己的股票),那些谣言肯定是不真实的。人们过分乐观了呀,但是那些高管只是算计着用回购股票这招驱散对银行健康发展不利的谣言。

选项A说,1是正面,2 是说反面。。。很对呀。。。
选项B说, 2是对1的支持。。。好像不是很对呀。。。
请NN指点

作者: flyinggemini    时间: 2008-9-30 06:46

2 is a position that the arguer holds, i think, so could be called intermedia conclusion, but there 's no evidence.

作者: BCorBentley    时间: 2008-9-30 20:29

应该是D

A.      The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.  第二个不是证据,而是作者的结论,也是全文的结论

D:    The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2