标题: 请问og73题 b选项 would 为何不好,应该换成should [打印本页] 作者: asasasas1 时间: 2004-9-28 12:11 标题: 请问og73题 b选项 would 为何不好,应该换成should
og:the if clause in B must take should rather than would 为什么？73. The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.(A)how they would have to act militarily to deal with them(B)how to deal with them if military action would be necessary(C)what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event(D)what military action would be necessary in orderto deal with such an event (E)the necessity of what kind of military action inorder to take for dealing with it
In choices A and B, the pronoun them has no antecedent; furthermore, the if clause in B must take should rather than would (虚拟语气).In C, necessary militarily is awkward and vague (不如D表达的清晰). E is wordy and garbles the meaning with incorrect word order. Choice D is best: its phrasing is clear, grammatical, and idiomatic. Moreover, D is the choice that most closely parallels the construction of the nonunderlined portion of the sentence. The sentence states that the Admiralty and the War Office met to consider x and y, where x is the noun phrase a possible Russian attempt. D provides a noun phrase, military action, that matches the structure of x more closely than do the corresponding noun elements in the other choices.
通常一个概括性的名词要比代词清晰的多（这往往成为正确答案的标志）作者: himba 时间: 2004-9-28 12:14
A选项中的THEY 指带不明,HAVE TO 也带有主观色彩.B中的THEM 应该用ITC中的NECESSARY应和TO 搭配D中用EVENT这个新名词指带,消除了歧义.E中的NECESSITY 不简洁,FOR也用错了,整个句子看上去很罗嗦.
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
