标题: OG 9 [打印本页] 作者: asasasas1 时间: 2004-9-4 12:39 标题: OG 9
9. Astronomers at the Palomar Observatory have discovered a distant supernova explosion, one that they believe is a type previously unknown to science.
(A) that they believe is
(B) that they believe it to be
(C) they believe that it is of
(D) they believe that is
(E) they believe to be of
又把这题翻出来了。^_^比较让我疑惑的是,为什么不用the one,,而用one....为什么省掉了that..OG的解释我一点也不明白。作者: mary1 时间: 2004-9-4 12:41
In OG,. Finally, A, B, and D lack of and so illogically equate this particular explosion with the whole class of explosions to which it belongs: it is not a type but possibly one of a type.One of a type, it sounds ok to me but don't know the official rule about one of a type, one of a kind, or ... we can't say one of a chair, right?
For this particular question, can we say "..... explosion, one type previously unknown to science?"
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)