Board logo

标题: 帮我分析一句话, thanks! [打印本页]

作者: bnbf    时间: 2004-7-28 08:36     标题: 帮我分析一句话, thanks!

Nonetheless, most judges now employ only a limited and primitive concept of jury inferential

error;limited because it fails to recognize the potential for error outside certain traditional situations,

primitive because it ignores the research and conclusions of psychologists in favor of notions

about human cognition held by lawyers.

"in favor of " above refers to whom? the research and conclusions or it?

Thanks!
作者: kuuiytt    时间: 2004-7-28 08:41

the research and conclusions of psychologists in favor of notions

about human cognition held by lawyers.

in favor of和研究的逻辑主语都是psychologists






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2